I see a lot of Xbox fans attack the PS4 for having a more varied and unique library of exclusives as if this is somehow a bad thing and I have to ask why? Is there no room in the games industry for titles that aren't generic AAA titles that favor graphics over gameplay substance?
"Behold, I shall corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces" Malachi 2:3, The Bible
They're mostly equivalent to improved Snes, Sega genesis games. They will(gwg) and should be free. They're time fillers, I never seat down to game and say I can't wait to play a indie, they are the I have nothing to play kind of game. 97% of them are not fun to me. I paid $400+ to play better looking, playing games.
Own: Xbox one, 360, PS3, Wii Richard is also known as Dick.
Not all Xbox fans hate indies, not all Sony fans like indies.
The argument with the most credibility against indies is that gamers didn't spend $400-$500 dollars on new consoles to play indie games. Of course there's room for both. Xbox fanboys usually only attack indies when comparing the PS4 and X1 lineups.
The problem with most sites is that people with something positive to say are usually outspoken by someone with something negative to say.
Not a lot of people are going to make a topic that says:
"Indies are awesome. Check out this new indie game."
It's very rare and when one does pop up, it's usually filled with something negative and gets a lot of posts. This is where the idea of people hating on indie would come from, or people hating on anything. One topic is made, a small group of people voice their opinion, which is usually negative and then everyone is thrown into the same group as them.