is there a reason flac isnt supported by new media player

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One
  3. is there a reason flac isnt supported by new media player
2 years ago#11
MrImpatient35 posted...
axelfooley2k5 posted...
OpheliaAdenade posted...
Probably because no one knows what flac is. :U


I wish people would wake up and stop supporting mp3


I go with .mp3 format because I'm not an audiofile, and the file size is good. I have 4,000+ songs, so roughly how much space would I need if they were all flac?


Huge difference in file size...like 6X bigger
Rolling Stones, Street Fighting Man, G-Sevennnnnnnnnnn!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud71mm2TxP4
2 years ago#12
I know what flac is and even have a few albums in that format, but tbh, mp3 is good enough. Flac takes up too damn much space and the difference isn't noticeable on my headphones and mobile anyway.
http://i.imgur.com/8LUhEFG.jpg
2 years ago#13
scoobydoobydont posted...
I know what flac is and even have a few albums in that format, but tbh, mp3 is good enough. Flac takes up too damn much space and the difference isn't noticeable on my headphones and mobile anyway.


difference is huge

if you have crappy ear buds or crappy headphones sure ........

space could be a problem for some sure

but once you go from the garbage mp3 to the quality files and hear the difference it is tough to go back
Rolling Stones, Street Fighting Man, G-Sevennnnnnnnnnn!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud71mm2TxP4
2 years ago#14
I guess it depends on your idea of huge. I find most guys tend to exaggerate on that front. =P
http://i.imgur.com/8LUhEFG.jpg
2 years ago#15
scoobydoobydont posted...
I guess it depends on your idea of huge. I find most guys tend to exaggerate on that front. =P


it is huge
im not just arguing with you for no reason

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossy_compression
Rolling Stones, Street Fighting Man, G-Sevennnnnnnnnnn!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud71mm2TxP4
2 years ago#16
if the speakers you listen through are average to poor it wont make a difference

but if you have the ability it makes all the difference

mp3 compression is at a huge disadvantage
Rolling Stones, Street Fighting Man, G-Sevennnnnnnnnnn!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud71mm2TxP4
2 years ago#17
Wait a minute TC. Did you used to make Youtube videos about Borderlands 2? I remember that name.

But anyway, you definitely seem like an audiofile.
HIIT or Tabata is necessary for me
2 years ago#18
no ive never played it...lol

i played the first a bunch
Rolling Stones, Street Fighting Man, G-Sevennnnnnnnnnn!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud71mm2TxP4
2 years ago#19
You haven't made a case for anything other than it being technically different. I don't care about any non-practical difference, and even with a good sound system the difference between 320kbs mp3 and flac is not "huge" in any practical way.
http://i.imgur.com/8LUhEFG.jpg
2 years ago#20
Real argument is why people still think 320kbps is the "best type" of mp3 when variable bitrate should be the standard. 320kbps is even more of a waste of space than a flac is, as flac is at least lossless whereas 320kbps constant bitrate just has a bigger filesize for no damn reason.
http://psnprofiles.com/MapleStory
My eyes are open and my pants are off. Time to go on a date!
  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One
  3. is there a reason flac isnt supported by new media player

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived