This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

For the first time since gen 2 we might not have a dragon type as a legendary

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. For the first time since gen 2 we might not have a dragon type as a legendary
2 years ago#1
How do you guys feel about it?
---
Gardenia Month!
http://i.imgur.com/2UK2Z.jpg http://i.imgur.com/3fBl5.jpg http://i.imgur.com/msXxq.jpg http://i.imgur.com/Clq47.jpg
2 years ago#2
ok
---
KAMMY KOOPA and baby kammy koopa for Super Smash Bros
U
2 years ago#3
I say its about time.
---
http://nsa24.casimages.com/img/2010/10/20/101020032317365660.jpg
2 years ago#4
The red legendary from the video looks like it could be a dragon type.
Anyways why focus on dragon? There are other types that have been around for longer or just as long as legendaries.
We've had Psychic and Flying since gen 1, Water since gen 2, and Steel since gen 3.
---
http://i.imgur.com/VYCNT.png
2 years ago#5
Oh, there'll be one...
---
http://i.imgur.com/J9fDu.jpg - by Cyber___Dragon
2 years ago#6
bretonftw posted...
Oh, there'll be one...


This. There's just a chance that the mascot isn't one.
---
PSN=Gelthidor
2 years ago#7
From: IionIiar | #004
The red legendary from the video looks like it could be a dragon type.
Anyways why focus on dragon? There are other types that have been around for longer or just as long as legendaries.
We've had Psychic and Flying since gen 1, Water since gen 2, and Steel since gen 3.

But I meant as on the cover legendaries.
---
Gardenia Month!
http://i.imgur.com/2UK2Z.jpg http://i.imgur.com/3fBl5.jpg http://i.imgur.com/msXxq.jpg http://i.imgur.com/Clq47.jpg
2 years ago#8
IionIiar posted...
The red legendary from the video looks like it could be a dragon type.
Anyways why focus on dragon? There are other types that have been around for longer or just as long as legendaries.
We've had Psychic and Flying since gen 1, Water since gen 2, and Steel since gen 3.


I think it's just a nice change of pace for the big 2 to not be dragons.
---
"Let's just say they're...not okay" - Madara Uchiha
2 years ago#9
From: Goten55 | #007
From: IionIiar | #004
The red legendary from the video looks like it could be a dragon type.
Anyways why focus on dragon? There are other types that have been around for longer or just as long as legendaries.
We've had Psychic and Flying since gen 1, Water since gen 2, and Steel since gen 3.

But I meant as on the cover legendaries.


Okay I see what you meant. I still do think that the red legendary could be a dragon, though there's a possibility that it will be flying instead. I'm more concerned with the possibility of the cover legendaries being fire and water, based on their color schemes. It's such a stale dichotomy. I'm thinking flying and grass might be nice. Flying because, well, the red legendary is flying, and grass because the giant deer reminds me of the giant deer that guarded the forest in Princess Mononoke.
---
http://i.imgur.com/VYCNT.png
2 years ago#10
DarkFists posted...
bretonftw posted...
Oh, there'll be one...


This. There's just a chance that the mascot isn't one.


I really hope they don't go crazy with legendaries this time around. They should have the main two, a trio, and one more that's either a third version mascot, or an event mon.
---
Official Chespin of the Pokemon X boards.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. For the first time since gen 2 we might not have a dragon type as a legendary

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived