This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Assuming some rumors from "Rainbow" version are true...

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Assuming some rumors from "Rainbow" version are true...

User Info: Dagdamor3725

Dagdamor3725
4 years ago#1
They suggested only about 20 new Pokemon.

Assuming the starters have 2 evolutions to them, and the two legendaries, that means there's only room for about 9 more Pokemon.

Honestly, I'm okay with that. If those nine are maybe semi-legendary Pokemon (akin to Volcorona) or just ones with really awesome new typings.

My only fear, then, is we'll have dark caves filled with a combination of Roggenrollas, Geodudes, Woobats, and Zubats. EVERYWHERE.
PS3/Vita - Dagdamor3725
3DS - 5241-3238-1742 - Tony

User Info: FuneralCake

FuneralCake
4 years ago#2
Wait, why would you assume anything about "Rainbow" is true? Considering we got something completely different from what was "predicted."
SERIOUSLY NOT HOME ROWED
want some funeral to go with that cake?

User Info: Majora999

Majora999
4 years ago#3
...Except for the 3D transition, NOTHING from that rumor was right, why would only 20 new Pokemon be right?
Not changing sig until Gamefreak brings back R/S/E Secret Bases ~ 2/20/11

User Info: lilORANG

lilORANG
4 years ago#4
Rainbow is false brah. This is new gen with a whole new set of pokemon.
http://www.last.fm/user/lilORANG
http://i.imgur.com/9zbAe.jpg http://i.imgur.com/GzuiD.jpg http://i.imgur.com/mppIg.jpg

User Info: blue_hedgehog

blue_hedgehog
4 years ago#5
We've only seen 5 new pokemon, you can't say for sure that there are only 20 new pokemon from the Pokemon Direct
Official Cyndaquil of the Pokemon Black/White Version 2 Board - http://i.imgur.com/XWPfA.png
Click HERE to find out if you're stupid.

User Info: R0cks0l1dd

R0cks0l1dd
4 years ago#6
People actually believed that crap? Lol.
I doubt they'll use any of those names; they're too bland. And they can't use Black or White for race reasons.
bond007106 of Neoseeker

User Info: Dagdamor3725

Dagdamor3725
4 years ago#7
I didn't say assuming Rainbow was true...

I said "assuming some rumors from it were true".

Meaning, maybe some aspects.

I dunno.
PS3/Vita - Dagdamor3725
3DS - 5241-3238-1742 - Tony

User Info: HomeRowed

HomeRowed
4 years ago#8
But why would aspects of it be true if it was entirely false? I'm not really understanding you here...
HOME ROWED
ain't no skank

User Info: jayman7

jayman7
4 years ago#9
So your topic was basically, "If we assume this thing that was proved entirely false is partially true, we have room for nine new Pokemon, an unprecedentedly tiny generation that fans would riot over, and I would be cool with that."

How did you expect people to respond?
Creator of Jay's Journey (see quote!)
"It's not ten years old! Therefore, it sucks!" - Nostalgia whores everywhere

User Info: Haku125

Haku125
4 years ago#10
Dagdamor3725 posted...
I didn't say assuming Rainbow was true...

I said "assuming some rumors from it were true".

Meaning, maybe some aspects.

I dunno.


Yes you DONT know. So keep quiet
Superbot: Oh you want us to nerf Sackboy? Here why don't we break the game for you!
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Assuming some rumors from "Rainbow" version are true...

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived