This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Assuming some rumors from "Rainbow" version are true...

#1Dagdamor3725Posted 1/8/2013 4:19:10 PM
They suggested only about 20 new Pokemon.

Assuming the starters have 2 evolutions to them, and the two legendaries, that means there's only room for about 9 more Pokemon.

Honestly, I'm okay with that. If those nine are maybe semi-legendary Pokemon (akin to Volcorona) or just ones with really awesome new typings.

My only fear, then, is we'll have dark caves filled with a combination of Roggenrollas, Geodudes, Woobats, and Zubats. EVERYWHERE.
---
PS3/Vita - Dagdamor3725
3DS - 5241-3238-1742 - Tony
#2FuneralCakePosted 1/8/2013 4:20:30 PM
Wait, why would you assume anything about "Rainbow" is true? Considering we got something completely different from what was "predicted."
---
SERIOUSLY NOT HOME ROWED
want some funeral to go with that cake?
#3Majora999Posted 1/8/2013 4:20:53 PM
...Except for the 3D transition, NOTHING from that rumor was right, why would only 20 new Pokemon be right?
---
Not changing sig until Gamefreak brings back R/S/E Secret Bases ~ 2/20/11
#4lilORANGPosted 1/8/2013 4:21:33 PM
Rainbow is false brah. This is new gen with a whole new set of pokemon.
---
http://www.last.fm/user/lilORANG
http://i.imgur.com/9zbAe.jpg http://i.imgur.com/GzuiD.jpg http://i.imgur.com/mppIg.jpg
#5blue_hedgehogPosted 1/8/2013 4:22:06 PM
We've only seen 5 new pokemon, you can't say for sure that there are only 20 new pokemon from the Pokemon Direct
---
Official Cyndaquil of the Pokemon Black/White Version 2 Board - http://i.imgur.com/XWPfA.png
Click HERE to find out if you're stupid.
#6R0cks0l1ddPosted 1/8/2013 4:25:07 PM
People actually believed that crap? Lol.
---
I doubt they'll use any of those names; they're too bland. And they can't use Black or White for race reasons.
bond007106 of Neoseeker
#7Dagdamor3725(Topic Creator)Posted 1/8/2013 4:26:48 PM
I didn't say assuming Rainbow was true...

I said "assuming some rumors from it were true".

Meaning, maybe some aspects.

I dunno.
---
PS3/Vita - Dagdamor3725
3DS - 5241-3238-1742 - Tony
#8HomeRowedPosted 1/8/2013 4:28:42 PM
But why would aspects of it be true if it was entirely false? I'm not really understanding you here...
---
HOME ROWED
ain't no skank
#9jayman7Posted 1/8/2013 4:28:50 PM
So your topic was basically, "If we assume this thing that was proved entirely false is partially true, we have room for nine new Pokemon, an unprecedentedly tiny generation that fans would riot over, and I would be cool with that."

How did you expect people to respond?
---
Creator of Jay's Journey (see quote!)
"It's not ten years old! Therefore, it sucks!" - Nostalgia whores everywhere
#10Haku125Posted 1/8/2013 4:30:15 PM
Dagdamor3725 posted...
I didn't say assuming Rainbow was true...

I said "assuming some rumors from it were true".

Meaning, maybe some aspects.

I dunno.


Yes you DONT know. So keep quiet
---
Superbot: Oh you want us to nerf Sackboy? Here why don't we break the game for you!