3DS » Role-Playing » Console-style RPG

Pokemon X

Stealth Rock and Scald in Gen VI.

Back To: Board List | Topic List | Topic Archived
scrappybristol
Posted 1/10/2013 11:59:27 AM
Stealth Rock now has a limit of five hits then disappears.

Scalds' burn chance is reduced to 10%.

I mean... when you wish upon a star right?
---
Ring Ring
mondrae205
Posted 1/10/2013 12:00:07 PM
I say make it easier to get rid of.
---
Congratulations, random chance is random and based on chance -Naucitos
Official Arceus of pokemon X board
Arkyron
Posted 1/10/2013 12:00:16 PM
In my opinion, Stealth Rock needs a nerf, but Scald is fine.
---
YOU'LL GET NO PASTRIES FROM ME! I BAKE FOR MY FRIENDS!
Pokemon Black Friend Code - 4341 1902 1927
Soanevalcke6
Posted 1/10/2013 12:03:10 PM
Bring in Stealth Ice, but you can only have one "Stealth" up at a time, and they never go away except with Rapid Spin.

That way people would have to choose whether to Bring Stealth Ice or Stealth Rocks, and then base their team on either Stealth Rocks or Stealth Ice.
---
They made a moon base to survey my standards but they have yet to make visual contact.
PSN/NNID/Steam: Soanevalcke6 // http://www.backloggery.com/soanevalcke6
Mugiloko
Posted 1/10/2013 12:04:04 PM
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
ffdgh
Posted 1/10/2013 12:04:53 PM
bring stealth fire and stealth ice to really screw things up for the metagame XD
---
the current condition of Nintendo by internet standards.DOOOOOMED
Keyblades and a flightless angel.
Runeboggle
Posted 1/10/2013 12:05:13 PM
F*** no on both.
If anything, cap SR's damage at 25%. That stops the fanboys b****ing about their Charizard.
---
4670791
Si || http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVQBpWE2tyA
Lexifox
Posted 1/10/2013 12:05:54 PM
I think SR isn't that bad, but would prefer a damage cap over such a nerf.
---
"Murder of the living is tragic, but murder of the idea is unforgivable." - Janus, speaker of the synod
Polimario
Posted 1/10/2013 12:07:50 PM
Lexifox posted...
I think SR isn't that bad, but would prefer a damage cap over such a nerf.


Pretty much this.
---
Get on my bad side...and I'll freeze you solid!
Self-Proclaimed Kyurem of all eternity.
_KGC_
Posted 1/10/2013 12:08:00 PM
Runeboggle posted...
F*** no on both.
If anything, cap SR's damage at 25%. That stops the fanboys b****ing about their Charizard.


This, with a min cap of 6.25% as well.

Basically:
if you're hit super effectively then you lose 25%
If you're hit normally then you lose 12.5%
Not very effectively then you lose 6.25%
---
"You got to be careful if you don't know where you're going, because you might not get there."
- Yogi Berra