This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Should Pokemon ever have 4 vs 4 battles?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Should Pokemon ever have 4 vs 4 battles?

User Info: Ki_cat_

Ki_cat_
4 years ago#1
Or more? Like you wander through grass, caves etc to find Pokemon but they can come in groups. Would that be too big of a change to fight with a team of 4 (or less) against (at the most) 7? Just keep the trainer battles the same. A 6 vs 6 duel seems too chaotic.
People are afraid of what they don't understand.

User Info: Charizard90

Charizard90
4 years ago#2
Pokemon should have stayed with the 1 Vs 1 battles. 2 Vs 2 is also ok. Anything else is bull****, as are most of the things introduced in gen v.

So no, there should never be 4 Vs 4
Shinies: 40 -of which- Radar shinies: 38
Pkmn Platinum: Name: Hao FC: 2965-5119-9885

User Info: White_Queen

White_Queen
4 years ago#3
Why not just skip to 6 on 6 battle at the same time... non turn-based, real time battles?

It'll be an entertaining hot mess trainwreck!!

User Info: GoldenSun3DS

GoldenSun3DS
4 years ago#4
There should be 6 vs 6.
Camelot asked for your support of Golden Sun 4!
http://ipetitions.com/petition/operation-sunrise/ | http://facebook.com/pages/Operation-Sunrise/371417546251291

User Info: Lilraptor

Lilraptor
4 years ago#5
No. As much as I like large battles, they'd be too gimmicky and someone would quickly find a way to get Earthquake, Heat Wave, Discharge, and Surf on the same team and wreck all the things in one turn.
Waiting for Tang to come back since '03.

User Info: faruway

faruway
4 years ago#6
If the 4 vs 4 is in this gen and how the battle system works, seeing it would remind you that it's kinda like a pokemon street fight brawl/wrestling match, lol.
Official GilgaPrishe's Spicy Hot Taco Buddy of Dissidia 012 Duodecim Final Fantasy Board
WhiteFC: 2881 6954 3015, White2FC: 4342 0820 5010

User Info: Gaming_Mastery

Gaming_Mastery
4 years ago#7
No

Skip straight to 6 on 6.
Gotta crash the mode.

User Info: faruway

faruway
4 years ago#8
Gaming_Mastery posted...
No

Skip straight to 6 on 6.


Okay, that would be like an all out fight, lol!
Official GilgaPrishe's Spicy Hot Taco Buddy of Dissidia 012 Duodecim Final Fantasy Board
WhiteFC: 2881 6954 3015, White2FC: 4342 0820 5010

User Info: SalsaSavant

SalsaSavant
4 years ago#9
No, unless they find some good way to do it.

Triple battles were a cluster****, but Rotation at least had some good concepts and balance.
Not changing this until something impossible happens
Started 12/02/12

User Info: Solar_Crimson

Solar_Crimson
4 years ago#10
From: Charizard90 | Posted: 1/11/2013 10:19:58 PM | #002
Pokemon should have stayed with the 1 Vs 1 battles. 2 Vs 2 is also ok. Anything else is bull****, as are most of the things introduced in gen v.

So no, there should never be 4 Vs 4

Rotation Battles are pretty fun, and Triple Battles makes room for some interesting strategies.
http://backloggery.com/SolarCrimson - My Backloggery
The official Okuninushi of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Should Pokemon ever have 4 vs 4 battles?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived