This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Should Pokemon ever have 4 vs 4 battles?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Should Pokemon ever have 4 vs 4 battles?
2 years ago#1
Or more? Like you wander through grass, caves etc to find Pokemon but they can come in groups. Would that be too big of a change to fight with a team of 4 (or less) against (at the most) 7? Just keep the trainer battles the same. A 6 vs 6 duel seems too chaotic.
---
People are afraid of what they don't understand.
2 years ago#2
Pokemon should have stayed with the 1 Vs 1 battles. 2 Vs 2 is also ok. Anything else is bull****, as are most of the things introduced in gen v.

So no, there should never be 4 Vs 4
---
Shinies: 40 -of which- Radar shinies: 38
Pkmn Platinum: Name: Hao FC: 2965-5119-9885
2 years ago#3
Why not just skip to 6 on 6 battle at the same time... non turn-based, real time battles?

It'll be an entertaining hot mess trainwreck!!
2 years ago#4
There should be 6 vs 6.
---
Camelot asked for your support of Golden Sun 4!
http://ipetitions.com/petition/operation-sunrise/ | http://facebook.com/pages/Operation-Sunrise/371417546251291
2 years ago#5
No. As much as I like large battles, they'd be too gimmicky and someone would quickly find a way to get Earthquake, Heat Wave, Discharge, and Surf on the same team and wreck all the things in one turn.
---
Waiting for Tang to come back since '03.
2 years ago#6
If the 4 vs 4 is in this gen and how the battle system works, seeing it would remind you that it's kinda like a pokemon street fight brawl/wrestling match, lol.
---
Official GilgaPrishe's Spicy Hot Taco Buddy of Dissidia 012 Duodecim Final Fantasy Board
WhiteFC: 2881 6954 3015, White2FC: 4342 0820 5010
2 years ago#7
No

Skip straight to 6 on 6.
---
Gotta crash the mode.
2 years ago#8
Gaming_Mastery posted...
No

Skip straight to 6 on 6.


Okay, that would be like an all out fight, lol!
---
Official GilgaPrishe's Spicy Hot Taco Buddy of Dissidia 012 Duodecim Final Fantasy Board
WhiteFC: 2881 6954 3015, White2FC: 4342 0820 5010
2 years ago#9
No, unless they find some good way to do it.

Triple battles were a cluster****, but Rotation at least had some good concepts and balance.
---
Not changing this until something impossible happens
Started 12/02/12
2 years ago#10
From: Charizard90 | Posted: 1/11/2013 10:19:58 PM | #002
Pokemon should have stayed with the 1 Vs 1 battles. 2 Vs 2 is also ok. Anything else is bull****, as are most of the things introduced in gen v.

So no, there should never be 4 Vs 4

Rotation Battles are pretty fun, and Triple Battles makes room for some interesting strategies.
---
http://backloggery.com/SolarCrimson - My Backloggery
The official Okuninushi of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Should Pokemon ever have 4 vs 4 battles?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived