This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Light and Sound type Pokemon

  • Topic Archived

You have been randomly selected to participate in the Beta Test of our new message list page. We've rolled out this test in order to get additional feedback and error reports from a wider subset of users. We'll only display this notice once, but permanent links to disable the Beta, provide feedback, and get more information will be located at the bottom of each message list.

To disable this test for now, click here. For more information, please read our announcement about this redesign.

  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Light and Sound type Pokemon
2 years ago#21
Fat type Pokemon. Takes 3/4 damage from everything but slow. .
---
Alienware M17x R4 | i7-3720QM | 2GB 7970M | 16GB DDR3-1600 | 128GB Samsung PM830 mSATA SSD
2 years ago#22
Someguy_13 posted...
Can the people who seem so adamantly against this please explain why?

I think the addition of a couple new types could be a cool idea.
Were you all so against Dark and Steel as well?


Sound as a type is flimsy at best. It's not an element in the traditional sense, nor is there much that would support it.

Light is frowned upon because it's generally a misconception of the Dark type - rather than darkness and shadows, Dark is a type about being sneaky and dishonest. It is "trickery" and deceit. Fighting, at this point, is the counter to the Dark type - one fights dirty while the other does not, so much so that Fighting is considered a "heroic" typing.
---
"Murder of the living is tragic, but murder of the idea is unforgivable." - Janus, speaker of the synod
2 years ago#23
Lexifox posted...
Someguy_13 posted...
Can the people who seem so adamantly against this please explain why?

I think the addition of a couple new types could be a cool idea.
Were you all so against Dark and Steel as well?


Sound as a type is flimsy at best. It's not an element in the traditional sense, nor is there much that would support it.

Light is frowned upon because it's generally a misconception of the Dark type - rather than darkness and shadows, Dark is a type about being sneaky and dishonest. It is "trickery" and deceit. Fighting, at this point, is the counter to the Dark type - one fights dirty while the other does not, so much so that Fighting is considered a "heroic" typing.


True. The evil shadowy evil type is covered by the Ghost type and it is countered by the Normal type.
---
[This signature was deleted at the request of Kingler]
Pokemon White FC: 3267 4497 6644 Name: Ash
2 years ago#24
Light is Fight.
---
"The benevolent see benevolence and the wise see wisdom."
~Chinese proverb
2 years ago#25
From: RageKaiser | #002
Why do people want these stupid types?

---
Nothing to see here
2 years ago#26
What the hell would Sound be effective against/weak to anyways?
---
PSN: TheUndying84
2 years ago#27
Someguy_13 posted...
Can the people who seem so adamantly against this please explain why?

I think the addition of a couple new types could be a cool idea.
Were you all so against Dark and Steel as well?


The difference here is that types shouldn't be added for the sake of adding new types. Dark and Steel actually had a gameplay reason to be implemented.
(edited by arvilino)
2 years ago#28
Yvitail is a wyvern as much as this guy TC

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-czuZgcjPpIM/UPHn-okQoJI/AAAAAAAAAJI/QGWttVFMm1o/s500/37578986136.jpg
---
My pokemon run http://thepunchlineismachismo.com/archives/150
2 years ago#29
Lexifox posted...
Someguy_13 posted...
Can the people who seem so adamantly against this please explain why?

I think the addition of a couple new types could be a cool idea.
Were you all so against Dark and Steel as well?


Sound as a type is flimsy at best. It's not an element in the traditional sense, nor is there much that would support it.

Light is frowned upon because it's generally a misconception of the Dark type - rather than darkness and shadows, Dark is a type about being sneaky and dishonest. It is "trickery" and deceit. Fighting, at this point, is the counter to the Dark type - one fights dirty while the other does not, so much so that Fighting is considered a "heroic" typing.


While I see your point for Light, Sound as a type doesn't seem that much of a stretch to me.

Certain Pokemon already seem to fit well into that type (Jigglypuff, Loudred, etc), and certain moves would make much more sense as a sound type than Normal (Supersonic and Sing for example).
They could also add new Pokemon and moves that make use of it. There's more supporting a Sound type than there was for Dark and Steel.

I don't think it matters that sound isn't an element.
Neither is Fighting.
---
Survivor of the Yahoo Bunker War of 2010
2 years ago#30
arvilino posted...
Someguy_13 posted...
Can the people who seem so adamantly against this please explain why?

I think the addition of a couple new types could be a cool idea.
Were you all so against Dark and Steel as well?


The difference here is that types shouldn't be added for the sake of adding new types. Dark and Steel actually had a gameplay reason to be implemented.


What's wrong with adding new types just for the sake of it? More variation is always good and it would mix up battles a bit.

And I can think of at least one gameplay reason to have more types:
It could make some of the weaker types better by being bad against them, while also being another option against some of the stronger types.
---
Survivor of the Yahoo Bunker War of 2010
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Light and Sound type Pokemon

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

Message List Beta Test is now on. To disable the Beta, just click here, or you can read more about it, report an error, or provide general feedback.
  • Topic Archived