This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Anyone here DO NOT want Pokemon to be transferrable?

#71XxMahnaMahnaxXPosted 1/18/2013 2:21:15 PM
Anyone who doesn't is a heartless jerk
---
Why don't we show them the entire process including our breakdown.
http://i.imgur.com/Q0xhR.png?2?6330
#72blackyoshi33Posted 1/18/2013 2:21:23 PM
NO! We've all worked so damn hard for the guys we have!
---
---
Music ages different than humans; songs may get old, but they never die.
#73aryanbrarPosted 1/18/2013 2:22:07 PM
i disagree, people hated gen 3 because you couldn't transfer your gen1/2 pokes.
#74XxMahnaMahnaxXPosted 1/18/2013 2:22:21 PM
Silentdaze posted...
I'd like to flip the question a bit - lets say that Gamefreaks announces previous gens won't be transferable - who here would be so angered that they wouldn't buy x/y?


I would be absolutely livid
---
Why don't we show them the entire process including our breakdown.
http://i.imgur.com/Q0xhR.png?2?6330
#75FuneralCakePosted 1/18/2013 2:23:02 PM
I don't really care either way. I usually start over in each game for the most part, anyway, so it would be fine by me. Didn't bother me with 3rd gen.
---
STOP CALLING ME HOME ROWED
shut up before i make you shut up
#76ryudin89Posted 1/18/2013 2:27:07 PM
prince_leo posted...
Everyone who is against the idea of blocking off transfers, are you against it if they rework movelists, base stats, and how evolution works for some pokemon?
Or are you so intent on not losing progress from the last decade that you want to see the gameplay make no innovation in such a big way?


I don't mind GF reworking the game, but I also want to continue my game with the partners I've made and trained over the last 3 gens. I honestly don't see why we cannot have both. People make it sound like Gamefreak cannot rework the game without absolutely blocking everything else.

There are no absolutes in the world. What's to say that they can't update everything and have pokemon transferred over updated? Why do we need to completely bar them out over what a vocal minority wants?
---
GameFAQS=why games should be played and people should be avoided.-selfdeztruction
http://fav.me/d3e91yr
#77prince_leoPosted 1/18/2013 2:33:36 PM
ryudin89 posted...
There are no absolutes in the world. What's to say that they can't update everything and have pokemon transferred over updated? Why do we need to completely bar them out over what a vocal minority wants?


The only way how this could work would be like how Gen 2 traded to Gen 1, where certain moves wouldn't be allowed to go through the time capsule
Would you be okay with it if that were the case? (Ex. Mudkip from Gen IV with Stealth Rock can't be traded until you delete Stealth Rock).
---
No man stands so tall as he who stoops to help a child.
http://i.imgur.com/VH2Nc.jpg - Young Leo has more swag than you
#78KeeperOfShadowsPosted 1/18/2013 2:34:30 PM
prince_leo posted...
Everyone who is against the idea of blocking off transfers, are you against it if they rework movelists, base stats, and how evolution works for some pokemon?
Or are you so intent on not losing progress from the last decade that you want to see the gameplay make no innovation in such a big way?


Is there any proof those changes couldn't be made without blocking out past pokemon? Some seem to think so, but is there really a reason why the new games wouldn't reprogram certain aspects of older pokemon? Just curious, I'm no little about programming.
---
I am The Defender of Darkness. The Knight of Nothingness. The Master of Murkiness.
I am the Keeper of Shadows, AND I WILL RULE YOU!!
#79ryudin89Posted 1/18/2013 2:35:52 PM
prince_leo posted...
ryudin89 posted...
There are no absolutes in the world. What's to say that they can't update everything and have pokemon transferred over updated? Why do we need to completely bar them out over what a vocal minority wants?


The only way how this could work would be like how Gen 2 traded to Gen 1, where certain moves wouldn't be allowed to go through the time capsule
Would you be okay with it if that were the case? (Ex. Mudkip from Gen IV with Stealth Rock can't be traded until you delete Stealth Rock).


Didn't they do this same thing with gen 3 to 4? If so then yes because at least it's something that can be dealt with, not a completely and ridiculous ban for no reason.
---
GameFAQS=why games should be played and people should be avoided.-selfdeztruction
http://fav.me/d3e91yr
#80ultimatedorkboyPosted 1/18/2013 2:35:59 PM
A simple answer shall suffice...

NO
---
I love my Vita :)
http://tinyurl.com/9wrdhuj