This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Should they get rid of the 'Normal' type altogether?

#11CakeOfLiesPosted 2/6/2013 3:22:12 PM
Don't get rid of Normal Type.
There are already WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too many things with it for GameFreak to remove it from the series.
---
https://i.chzbgr.com/completestore/12/8/11/wXLYp87DiE2C6xnGXLS7BA2.jpg
#12WilhuffTarkinPosted 2/6/2013 3:23:21 PM(edited)
Personally, I don't get how there can be dual typed Pokemon when one type is Normal. You'd think that "Normal" would preclude dual typing by nature.

But, I think Normal should stick around as a type. It even makes perfect sense as a type in some instances, such as with Eevee.
---
Evacuate? In our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances.
#13MisoSoup27Posted 2/6/2013 5:56:16 PM
No because Bidoof
---
XBL: Maniac MisoSoup
Steam: MisoSoup
#14jayman7Posted 2/6/2013 6:34:28 PM
Mesmeril posted...
overmaxx posted...
Yeah, make Normal have no weaknesses, just like it doesn't hit anything for 2x.

Though Blissey would be uber material if this happened.


That's what I think, because it doesn't make sense that Normal is weak to Fighting. If there is a meaning behind this, then please explain. If a hero (Fighting) takes on evil (Dark), that makes sense. But hero attacks Normal/civilian, then that's evil as well.


Fighting isn't a "hero" type. It's a martial arts type.

Yes, there are some people who falsely say that the Fighting type is called "Hero" in Japanese. It isn't. Mostly this remains popular because people try to use it to discredit the possibility of a "Light" type.
---
Creator of Jay's Journey (see quote!)
"It's not ten years old! Therefore, it sucks!" - Nostalgia whores everywhere