This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Ninfia is a new type. Prove me wrong.

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Ninfia is a new type. Prove me wrong.
3 years ago#41
I can prove 2=1 with actual math, doesn't mean it's right.
3 years ago#42
From: pokemonpokemon4 | #041
I can prove 2=1 with actual math, doesn't mean it's right.


Do itttt.
---
http://i.imgur.com/Pzq4j.gif
3 years ago#43
From: Spartan_Vice | #034
0.9 repeating = 1

You prove me wrong!

Why would I try to prove something that is correct wrong?

From: pokemonpokemon4 | #041
I can prove 2=1 with actual math, doesn't mean it's right.

To do so, though, you have to divide by zero.
---
4670791
Si || Saraneth, the Master
3 years ago#44
Spartan_Vice posted...
From: pokemonpokemon4 | #041
I can prove 2=1 with actual math, doesn't mean it's right.


Do itttt.

a=1
a=b
ab=b^2
ab-a^2=b^2-a^2
a(b-a)=(b-a)(b+a)
a=b+a
1=1+1
1=2

Runeboggle posted...
From: pokemonpokemon4 | #041
I can prove 2=1 with actual math, doesn't mean it's right.

To do so, though, you have to divide by zero.


Nope. Using algebra makes this work fine :)
3 years ago#45
There are quite a few flying types without wings.
---
The Platypus, the reason games like spore exist.
3 years ago#46
From: pokemonpokemon4 | #044
Spartan_Vice posted...
From: pokemonpokemon4 | #041
I can prove 2=1 with actual math, doesn't mean it's right.


Do itttt.

a=1
a=b
ab=b^2
ab-a^2=b^2-a^2
a(b-a)=(b-a)(b+a)
a=b+a
1=1+1
1=2

Runeboggle posted...
From: pokemonpokemon4 | #041
I can prove 2=1 with actual math, doesn't mean it's right.

To do so, though, you have to divide by zero.


Nope.


I just got mathed.
---
http://i.imgur.com/Pzq4j.gif
3 years ago#47
Spartan_Vice posted...
From: pokemonpokemon4 | #044
Spartan_Vice posted...
From: pokemonpokemon4 | #041
I can prove 2=1 with actual math, doesn't mean it's right.


Do itttt.

a=1
a=b
ab=b^2
ab-a^2=b^2-a^2
a(b-a)=(b-a)(b+a)
a=b+a
1=1+1
1=2
.


I just got mathed.


They guy before me was right though, you indeed DO divide by zero (b-a is 1-1, you can't divide like that), but he was ruining the fun so I pushed him aside :P
#48
(message deleted)
3 years ago#49
Too bad you're wrong. It's clearly obvious just by looking at it that it's a Normal type. Easily.
3 years ago#50
Since lately they've added evee evos in pairs this is just one of a pair like umbreon and espeon. It looks fairly like some other normal types, as well as being fairly girly. Perhaps it is a normal type evolution only available to female evees, and a male one may be revealed in the future. Total speculation but there's not much else out there.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Ninfia is a new type. Prove me wrong.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived