This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Has anyone thought that maybe Ninfia is just a Normal Evolution done by Beauty?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Has anyone thought that maybe Ninfia is just a Normal Evolution done by Beauty?
3 years ago#1
That what it seems like to me at this point.
---
Now in your absence I wade, Through the coursing, lonely, lost
And in this tragic dismay, I never could believe what I became
3 years ago#2
It can't be something that was done before.
---
http://i458.photobucket.com/albums/qq303/CharizardFire6/Char-Brawl.gif
3 years ago#3
From: CharizardFire | #002
It can't be something that was done before.

Why not?
---
Now in your absence I wade, Through the coursing, lonely, lost
And in this tragic dismay, I never could believe what I became
3 years ago#4
From: TacoOfTheOpera | #003
From: CharizardFire | #002
It can't be something that was done before.

Why not?

Why do you think Eevee doesn't evolve into Leafeon with a Leaf Stone?
---
http://i458.photobucket.com/albums/qq303/CharizardFire6/Char-Brawl.gif
3 years ago#5
Beauty contests could potentially make a come back in this game.


And I hate them all since gen 3.
---
This is a sig. Yup.
3 years ago#6
CharizardFire posted...
From: TacoOfTheOpera | #003
From: CharizardFire | #002
It can't be something that was done before.

Why not?

Why do you think Eevee doesn't evolve into Leafeon with a Leaf Stone?


You actually have a point. There's an unwritten rule in Pokemon where an old Pokemon can't get a new evolution (or baby) with an old method.

If it was done through beauty, why does Eevee not evolve when you maxed out his beauty before?

They're pretty careful about holes in the continuity.
---
Still waiting for Diddy Kong Racing 2
3 years ago#7
ADHDguitar posted...
CharizardFire posted...
From: TacoOfTheOpera | #003
From: CharizardFire | #002
It can't be something that was done before.

Why not?

Why do you think Eevee doesn't evolve into Leafeon with a Leaf Stone?


You actually have a point. There's an unwritten rule in Pokemon where an old Pokemon can't get a new evolution (or baby) with an old method.

If it was done through beauty, why does Eevee not evolve when you maxed out his beauty before?

They're pretty careful about holes in the continuity.


or umbreon through dusk stone, or espeon through shiny stone maybe


anyway heard someone throw out interesting idea, since X and Y are chromosomes and some versions of screenshots show dna double helixes in them it could be possible ninfia could be male only in one and female only in the other and weve only seen female evo...would also explain secret of evolution method and maybe different typings per version which could explain that as well

just me rambling on, hadnt heard much of this idea on boards so thought id throw it out there
---
3ds fc - 4983-5114-5815, Name: Brad
3 years ago#8
That rule has been broken before though. Lickilicky could've technically existed in gen II
3 years ago#9
From: wrightreyesrock | #008
That rule has been broken before though. Lickilicky could've technically existed in gen II

It wouldn't have been fair, though, since Lickitung could only learn Rollout through a non-reobtainable TM in Gen 2, while in Gen 3, it could only learn Rollout through a move tutor in Emerald that only teaches the move once.
---
http://i458.photobucket.com/albums/qq303/CharizardFire6/Char-Brawl.gif
3 years ago#10
No that's what makes Feebas unique.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Has anyone thought that maybe Ninfia is just a Normal Evolution done by Beauty?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived