This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Your reaction: Fire-type entry hazard

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Your reaction: Fire-type entry hazard
3 years ago#21
I think the idea of SR is fine, but a damage cap would be good, so that it can't "outdamage" Spikes so easily.
---
"Murder of the living is tragic, but murder of the idea is unforgivable." - Janus, speaker of the synod
3 years ago#22
Wait how does a burn hazard screw over ice, bug, and steel types more than other non-fire types? Burn takes away 1/8th HP regardless of typing.
---
Not changing this sig until we get a new main series Tales game released on a Nintendo console in the US
3 years ago#23
iKhanic posted...
Wait how does a burn hazard screw over ice, bug, and steel types more than other non-fire types? Burn takes away 1/8th HP regardless of typing.


All physical ice types would instantly be shafted. Paired on with a combonation of SR/FEH (Fire Entry Hazard) you've just crippled that Ice Pokemon. (even if it isn't a physical ice type)
---
Ignoring sheep. Best solution on CoD boards.
3 years ago#24
Would be really cool. But man it would be annoying.

Unless flying types/levitating pokemon were immune Salamence, and Gyarados would be screwed if that was on the field.

Also more people would probably end up using Special Attacking Pokemon.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Your reaction: Fire-type entry hazard

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived