so missing no was called missing number for no reason?
It's not called "missing Pokemon that was obviously removed because of space or time constraints but then added back in in GS because why the hell not." It's called "missing number" because it's a missing number. There's no data there.
That in no way suggests that these Pokemon were meant to be included in gen 1. They could have easily been pre-release Pokemon that were removed due to balance, design, etc. issues, or Pokemon that were removed and then later re-worked.
but hey if you want to call me a liar your calling everyone from bulbapedia to serebii liars as well.
Fine by me. Like I said, there's literally no factual evidence to back any of this up. All we have to go on is one person's word, and in case you haven't noticed, people like to make up things on the internet.
THAT'S MISS HOME ROWED TO YOU do you wanna die or just come real close?