This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Evolution should require you to slowly breed for specific traits while hoping

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Evolution should require you to slowly breed for specific traits while hoping
2 years ago#11
Windyligth posted...
My point is that they SHOULD be more based on natural selection than on metamorphosis.


But it's better the way things are now, and it makes sense. With most pokemon, you can find a corresponding lifecycle in nature or mythology. Such as With Torchic, Emboar, Eelektross, Gyarados, etc. etc.
---
:D
2 years ago#12
willingmess posted...
Windyligth posted...
My point is that they SHOULD be more based on natural selection than on metamorphosis.


But it's better the way things are now, and it makes sense. With most pokemon, you can find a corresponding lifecycle in nature or mythology. Such as With Torchic, Emboar, Eelektross, Gyarados, etc. etc.


See, here's a prime example of how my idea of evolution works better.
---
I am here to promote the discussion and appreciation of Fennekin.
2 years ago#13
Windyligth posted...
willingmess posted...
Windyligth posted...
My point is that they SHOULD be more based on natural selection than on metamorphosis.


But it's better the way things are now, and it makes sense. With most pokemon, you can find a corresponding lifecycle in nature or mythology. Such as With Torchic, Emboar, Eelektross, Gyarados, etc. etc.


See, here's a prime example of how my idea of evolution works better.


Ever heard of the myth of the carp that wanted to be a dragon? That didn't happen over thousands of years, it happened when the little guy worked hard and leaped through the waterfall to become a dragon.
---
:D
2 years ago#14
The key word there is myth though.

Realistically this kind of transformation would take an incredible amount of time, and an increased oxygen supply on the planet.
---
I am here to promote the discussion and appreciation of Fennekin.
#15
(message deleted)
2 years ago#16
Windyligth posted...
willingmess posted...
Windyligth posted...
My point is that they SHOULD be more based on natural selection than on metamorphosis.


But it's better the way things are now, and it makes sense. With most pokemon, you can find a corresponding lifecycle in nature or mythology. Such as With Torchic, Emboar, Eelektross, Gyarados, etc. etc.


See, here's a prime example of how my idea of evolution works better.


And that is why the system still works. Or they could finally changing it to the more accurate "Metamorphosis," and save us the pain of these sorts of topics.
2 years ago#17
It would be better. It would make breeding have a bigger role in the series.
---
I am here to promote the discussion and appreciation of Fennekin.
2 years ago#18
Breeding thousands of times to get something good? Pokémon already has IVs.
---
Moo
2 years ago#19
They could remove IV's in favor of this.
---
I am here to promote the discussion and appreciation of Fennekin.
2 years ago#20
TC, stop trying to force this onto us. If you want realism, go outside.
Pokemon doesn't need to be more realistic, it's fine as is (well that's not true, but the issue's are not realism based).
---
Officially faved Ninetales, everywhere, R - Burning Knight Executive
Facebook: http://alturl.com/juupo
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Evolution should require you to slowly breed for specific traits while hoping

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived