This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Later evolutions added that don't fit the line well

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Later evolutions added that don't fit the line well

User Info: makedounia

4 years ago#21
Bountyan posted...
Samurott. Should have stayed bipedal, and otter, and water/fighting.


User Info: mehmetski

4 years ago#22
no. if you knew anything about this pokemon, you'd know they intentionally designed samurott so it would be a dramatic change and become something the player would not expect. if it stayed bipedal, light blue, everyone would whine "it looks exactly like the prevos, thats soooo lame"

User Info: NumberXI

4 years ago#23
Porygon 2/Z

User Info: Jagus

4 years ago#24
What? Mismagius and Mamoswine are perfectly fine. Crobat is off though, I'll totally give you that.

I'd say Magmortar is horribly off.
No, marriage is about love. It fails because people think love can be reduced to a feeling. - On the Edge

User Info: EmeraldRange

4 years ago#25
Dragonite does not look at all like Dragonair. Don't get me wrong. I like Dragonite, but not the fact that it looks wierd
I don't like the new pokemon from Gen V and VI
"New is not a synonym of better" -wonder if it's been said before

User Info: _Odarp

4 years ago#26
The only thing that bigs me is when they dont give equivalent Pokemon evolutions at the same time:
Schyther got one but not pinsir.
Dusclops got one but not bannette
Weepinbel needs a split evo and so does cloyster.

It would be as if electabuz got an evo but not magmar.
If I was Rick Astley I would randomly Rick Roll people in the street. Total ownage.
PSN: Pratypus
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Later evolutions added that don't fit the line well

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived