This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Later evolutions added that don't fit the line well

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Later evolutions added that don't fit the line well
2 years ago#21
Bountyan posted...
Samurott. Should have stayed bipedal, and otter, and water/fighting.


This!
2 years ago#22
no. if you knew anything about this pokemon, you'd know they intentionally designed samurott so it would be a dramatic change and become something the player would not expect. if it stayed bipedal, light blue, everyone would whine "it looks exactly like the prevos, thats soooo lame"
2 years ago#23
Porygon 2/Z
2 years ago#24
What? Mismagius and Mamoswine are perfectly fine. Crobat is off though, I'll totally give you that.

I'd say Magmortar is horribly off.
---
No, marriage is about love. It fails because people think love can be reduced to a feeling. - On the Edge
2 years ago#25
Dragonite does not look at all like Dragonair. Don't get me wrong. I like Dragonite, but not the fact that it looks wierd
---
I don't like the new pokemon from Gen V and VI
"New is not a synonym of better" -wonder if it's been said before
2 years ago#26
The only thing that bigs me is when they dont give equivalent Pokemon evolutions at the same time:
Schyther got one but not pinsir.
Dusclops got one but not bannette
Weepinbel needs a split evo and so does cloyster.

It would be as if electabuz got an evo but not magmar.
---
If I was Rick Astley I would randomly Rick Roll people in the street. Total ownage.
PSN: Pratypus
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Later evolutions added that don't fit the line well

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived