I don't mind the notion of a new type because personally, I wanna see what GameFreak can do with it. --- I like English dubs.
#12jayman7Posted 4/27/2013 10:24:53 PM
I don't mind if they introduce new types and do so intelligently, I'm just not fond of "Fairy" as a hypothetical type (though this board has suggested far worse...) --- Creator of Jay's Journey (see quote!) "It's not ten years old! Therefore, it sucks!" - Nostalgia whores everywhere
#13westontickleePosted 4/27/2013 10:39:42 PM
Glad you came to your senses. Queen Jiggs forgives you --- People who hate on Queen Jiggs are obvious trolls Official Balthier of the FFXV Board
#14WindyligthPosted 4/28/2013 4:35:45 AM
Glad to see you've come to your senses. --- I am here to promote the discussion and appreciation of Fennekin.
#15paiprPosted 4/28/2013 7:25:22 AM
Did Magnemite magically change when trading gen 1 to 2? I never tried. Be funny though.
Yep, it did.
Changing old Pokemon's types when transferring to gen 6 would be easy, so there's no reason to restrict it.
I still don't like the idea of a Fairy type, mostly just for the name. Rename it, then I'll be fine with it.
i think honestly thats the biggest issue with it (aside from type chart "balance" purists) fairy type just sounds...... well i doubt it will help people feel less embarrassed to admit they play pokemon. pixie could be a good renaming for it. --- am i the only person that whishes game faqs offered the option to cut peoples comments from you topics?
#16BurningFlareXPosted 4/28/2013 7:36:02 AM
It should be weak against Fire, Electric, Ice and Rock (inb4stealthrock) Rock, Steel, Dragon, Grass and Poison should resist it. (Maybe not Dragon) I have no idea what it would be SE against or resist. Or in the best case scenario, it shouldn't even exist. --- I hate everything.