This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

So why does everyone hate smogon?

#221DarkDragon386Posted 5/2/2013 11:38:20 AM
And satire is insulting.

And none of what you said is satire.
---
Not changing this sig until The Undertaker vs. Chris Jericho happens on PPV (started October 4, 2009)
#222GiftedACIIIPosted 5/2/2013 11:44:30 AM(edited)
SMASHKING84 posted...
someone needs to do research.
virgin had meant exactly what i said in the past.
it wasn't until the late 20th century they changed it mean "not having sex"

and if i except that i have to except terms like "he's a virgin at playing pokemon"
or "he's a bagel virgin" sorry but i refuse to partake in using words in a way they have no real meaning any longer.


Are you really this dense or are you just trolling me? 20th+ century is now. Gay used to mean "happy" but now it means homosexual. Nobody uses thee and thy anymore.
And brush up your grammar dude, I can't understand half of what you type. It's "accept". Learn to capitalize too, did you not get past 3rd grade English? Or do you just not care how you type?

That's satire and insult. Idiot means "a foolish person" but it's still an insult. Then satire is moddable on gamefaqs.
#223SerperiorThanUPosted 5/2/2013 11:47:09 AM
smashking is trolling so badly.
#224SMASHKING84Posted 5/2/2013 11:48:15 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
"At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. The freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty and thus a good unto itself but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole. We have therefore been particularly vigilant to ensure that individual expressions of ideas remain free from governmentally imposed sanctions." The First Amendment envisions that the sort of robust political debate that takes place in a democracy will occasionally yield speech critical of public figures who are "intimately involved in the resolution of important public questions or, by reason of their fame, shape events in areas of concern to society at large". In New York Times, the Court held that the First Amendment gives speakers immunity from sanction with respect to their speech concerning public figures unless their speech is both false and made with "actual malice", i.e., with knowledge of its falsehood or with reckless disregard for the truth of the statement. Although false statements lack inherent value, the "breathing space" that freedom of expression requires in order to flourish must tolerate occasional false statements, lest there be an intolerable chilling effect on speech that does have constitutional value.
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bEA3gYeiaw
http://tinyurl.com/d3d5aq9 thanks supershadow for this
#225GiftedACIIIPosted 5/2/2013 11:52:00 AM
SMASHKING84 posted...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
"At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. The freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty and thus a good unto itself but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole. We have therefore been particularly vigilant to ensure that individual expressions of ideas remain free from governmentally imposed sanctions." The First Amendment envisions that the sort of robust political debate that takes place in a democracy will occasionally yield speech critical of public figures who are "intimately involved in the resolution of important public questions or, by reason of their fame, shape events in areas of concern to society at large". In New York Times, the Court held that the First Amendment gives speakers immunity from sanction with respect to their speech concerning public figures unless their speech is both false and made with "actual malice", i.e., with knowledge of its falsehood or with reckless disregard for the truth of the statement. Although false statements lack inherent value, the "breathing space" that freedom of expression requires in order to flourish must tolerate occasional false statements, lest there be an intolerable chilling effect on speech that does have constitutional value.


Joke poster confirmed. Gamefaqs doesn't need to abide by the constitution.
#226SMASHKING84Posted 5/2/2013 11:59:07 AM
wrong. gamefaqs is owned by cbs. who is monitered by the fcc,a goverment run regultory group.
and yes the fcc moniters more then then JUST tv.
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bEA3gYeiaw
http://tinyurl.com/d3d5aq9 thanks supershadow for this
#227Cataclysms(Moderator)Posted 5/2/2013 12:06:33 PM
SMASHKING84 posted...
wrong. gamefaqs is owned by cbs. who is monitered by the fcc,a goverment run regultory group.
and yes the fcc moniters more then then JUST tv.


They don't however monitor private message boards on the Internet. First amendment does not apply here.
---
Damn the Man! Save the Empire!
#228SMASHKING84Posted 5/2/2013 12:10:56 PM
Cataclysms posted...
SMASHKING84 posted...
wrong. gamefaqs is owned by cbs. who is monitered by the fcc,a goverment run regultory group.
and yes the fcc moniters more then then JUST tv.


They don't however monitor private message boards on the Internet. First amendment does not apply here.


this site isn't private it's public.
if it weren't public explain why the tou says the reason things get marked "is there publically viewable"
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bEA3gYeiaw
http://tinyurl.com/d3d5aq9 thanks supershadow for this
#229Cataclysms(Moderator)Posted 5/2/2013 12:17:20 PM
It is private. You have to sign up to be a member.
---
Damn the Man! Save the Empire!
#230Sevi_neyPosted 5/2/2013 12:19:01 PM
They were fine last gen. This gen they're ban happy idiots who suck all day.

Ban ****ing politoed for **** sakes
---
as the resurrection of Bill Cosby, relinquish your pudding or perish at the backhand of Bill Cosbyeatindapuddin