This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

so it confirm 1>3>4>2>5 ?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. so it confirm 1>3>4>2>5 ?
3 years ago#131
Except for nostalgia purposes, Gen 1 has the worst pokemon and it isn't even close.
3 years ago#132
1 = 3 > 2 >4 > 5
White: Daisy 1550 0892 3564 Gold: Gold 3268 1023 8138
3 years ago#133
Can we PLEASE stop making topics with the title 'So it is confirmed' or something with confirmed in the title, when it is just OPINION?

While it may be an amalgamation of opinions together, it still doesn't make it a confirmed fact. It is still opinion.

People really need to learn a little language
3 years ago#134
overmaxx posted...
5 > 4 > 3 > 2 > 1

This is objective fact, I'm sorry if you have nostalgia over dated gameplay systems and smaller less polished games.


No it's not. You just assume that all franchises get better with each game. They don't.

By your logic, the latest FF is the best (its not), the last Fire Emblem is the best (its not), the latest Mario Kart is the best (it's not), etc, etc.

I would still pick up a cartridge of Crystal and play it today and have more fun then I would Gen 1 or 4. Only Emerald would give it a run for it's money.

tl:dr version: Newer =/= Better.
"We were going to a funeral, but it looks like we got buried." -J.R. Smith
PSN: Whsguy
3 years ago#135
TheJester2 posted...
overmaxx posted...
5 > 4 > 3 > 2 > 1

This is objective fact, I'm sorry if you have nostalgia over dated gameplay systems and smaller less polished games.


No it's not. You just assume that all franchises get better with each game. They don't.

By your logic, the latest FF is the best (its not), the last Fire Emblem is the best (its not), the latest Mario Kart is the best (it's not), etc, etc.

I would still pick up a cartridge of Crystal and play it today and have more fun then I would Gen 1 or 4. Only Emerald would give it a run for it's money.

tl:dr version: Newer =/= Better.


Well that FE was pretty awesome, and many people (bar Endgame, Westbrick and KarthMoopa) agree that it was the best.

And it is an objective fact. Unless you do math a different way, but I'm pretty sure it's universal.
3 years ago#136
5 > 3 > 2 > 1 = 4
Waiting for golden Sun 3DS
2 things are infinite: The Universe and human stupidity. I'm not sure about the Universe, though -Albert Einstein
3 years ago#137
Master_Warlord7 posted...
GATTJT posted...
From: KittenLina | #002
Who said 3 was so good? 3 is terrible...


Joke opinion.


Your opinion is the joke opinion and minority, yes.


And thus the war between Gen 3 and Gen 4 rages on...
"You don't have an inferiority complex, you're just inferior."
-Sarcastic Announcer in Wave Race
3 years ago#138
javel34 posted...
1>5>2>4>3

Everyone hates gen 4 for being slow. Everone hates gen 3 pretty much now.

I would say 5>1 but that's just me.


Hate 4

Hate 3

Choose one.
"You don't have an inferiority complex, you're just inferior."
-Sarcastic Announcer in Wave Race
3 years ago#139
Strain42 posted...
No no no, you're wrong. That's not how it goes at all

The order goes 1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 5 > 6

That's the sequential order, right?


Idiot.

1<2<3<4<5<6

Get your math right.
"You don't have an inferiority complex, you're just inferior."
-Sarcastic Announcer in Wave Race
3 years ago#140
overmaxx posted...
5 > 4 > 3 > 2 > 1

This is objective fact, I'm sorry if you have nostalgia over dated gameplay systems and smaller less polished games.


This. Though 5=4 imo.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. so it confirm 1>3>4>2>5 ?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived