This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What if we were wrong about the starters

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. What if we were wrong about the starters
3 years ago#1
They are dual type but not with other older types. They are Fire/Fairy, Grass/Fairy and Water/Fairy?
proud owner of Pikanips
3 years ago#2
People would see a lack of Fire/Fighting and not care.
"Murder of the living is tragic, but murder of the idea is unforgivable." - Janus, speaker of the synod
3 years ago#3
http://i.imgur.com/JH7dKcu.gif
NO MORE HOME ROWED BECAUSE I'M A GOOD GIRL
so drag me down to the ocean floor, 'cause i don't wanna fight no more
#4
(message deleted)
3 years ago#5
FuneralCake posted...
http://i.imgur.com/JH7dKcu.gif


Nice self photo. You are attractive but a little derpy.
proud owner of Pikanips
3 years ago#6
I wish I was Krysten Ritter.

Actually, no.

Maybe?

I dunno.
NO MORE HOME ROWED BECAUSE I'M A GOOD GIRL
so drag me down to the ocean floor, 'cause i don't wanna fight no more
3 years ago#7
They've been confirmed as pure types. Unless you're talking about the evolutions, in which case... in no generation has any type been shared by multiple starter Pokémon.
For those of you starting topics about the PS4, there's a PS4 board:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/691087-playstation-4
3 years ago#8
Having its evolutions all have a secondairy fairy type..

That just strikes me as a bit.. Boring.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. What if we were wrong about the starters

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived