This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What if we were wrong about the starters

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. What if we were wrong about the starters
2 years ago#1
They are dual type but not with other older types. They are Fire/Fairy, Grass/Fairy and Water/Fairy?
---
proud owner of Pikanips
2 years ago#2
People would see a lack of Fire/Fighting and not care.
---
"Murder of the living is tragic, but murder of the idea is unforgivable." - Janus, speaker of the synod
2 years ago#3
http://i.imgur.com/JH7dKcu.gif
---
NO MORE HOME ROWED BECAUSE I'M A GOOD GIRL
so drag me down to the ocean floor, 'cause i don't wanna fight no more
#4
(message deleted)
2 years ago#5
FuneralCake posted...
http://i.imgur.com/JH7dKcu.gif


Nice self photo. You are attractive but a little derpy.
---
proud owner of Pikanips
2 years ago#6
I wish I was Krysten Ritter.

Actually, no.

Maybe?

I dunno.
---
NO MORE HOME ROWED BECAUSE I'M A GOOD GIRL
so drag me down to the ocean floor, 'cause i don't wanna fight no more
2 years ago#7
They've been confirmed as pure types. Unless you're talking about the evolutions, in which case... in no generation has any type been shared by multiple starter Pokémon.
---
For those of you starting topics about the PS4, there's a PS4 board:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/691087-playstation-4
2 years ago#8
Having its evolutions all have a secondairy fairy type..

That just strikes me as a bit.. Boring.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. What if we were wrong about the starters

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived