This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

How good would this attack be

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. How good would this attack be
3 years ago#1
Lowers defense (or another stat) but fully heals you ?
we rich now but used to be slaves,we pushing whips now we used to be whipped,rockin chains when we used to be in 'em
3 years ago#2
One use is fine but if you keep using it to heal yourself, you stat get lower which is bad. So no it is a compeltely harmful move that hinder you more than it helps you.
3 years ago#3
MetaDeDeDe posted...
One use is fine but if you keep using it to heal yourself, you stat get lower which is bad. So no it is a compeltely harmful move that hinder you more than it helps you.


Unless, of course, the stat is a stat that is useless for the Pokemon using it, like lowering Attack on a Special attacker.
http://meta289.deviantart.com/#/d4j1eby
Fact: Things are so much better when taken at face value.
3 years ago#4
I could see it work for slower pokemon. Heal off all the damage, then immediately switch out before the opponent can take advantage of the weakened stat. May be a bit predictable though.
3 years ago#5
Meta289 posted...
MetaDeDeDe posted...
One use is fine but if you keep using it to heal yourself, you stat get lower which is bad. So no it is a compeltely harmful move that hinder you more than it helps you.


Unless, of course, the stat is a stat that is useless for the Pokemon using it, like lowering Attack on a Special attacker.


Our lowering defense on special wall

It's over all pretty balanced
we rich now but used to be slaves,we pushing whips now we used to be whipped,rockin chains when we used to be in 'em
3 years ago#6
Contrary Shuckle & Contrary Serperior
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. How good would this attack be

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived