This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Can someone explain to me how Charizard "sucks?"

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Can someone explain to me how Charizard "sucks?"

User Info: ZTIger5

3 years ago#21
They're really just referring to competitive battles; more specifically Stealth Rock. Because apparently every pokemon in existence can learn it and its the most devastating attack in the history of ever.
Playing) Fire Emblem: Awakening, Guild Wars 2
Waiting) Pokemon XY

User Info: Ephemeral_Being

3 years ago#22
It takes tons of damage from Stealth Rocks, mainly. Entry hazards kill.
Coniido, 200 Buccaneer
PeriTheLame, 16X Bishop

User Info: jagddorsa

3 years ago#23
If Game Freak does just one thing next gen, I want them to nerf Stealth Rock. Change it to a multi turn setup like Spikes and Toxic Spikes, add more "Rapid Spin" type moves and users, anything would be good. Some medium-to-weak existing moves could conceivably remove hazards... Whirlpool, Whirlwind, Icy Wind, Razor Wind, Sliver Wind, Twister. Game Freak has a lot of options, but for some reason I think they'll just add a new entry hazard, like "Fairy Dust" or something.

User Info: jneal57

3 years ago#24
it doesn't suck.......but i have a rock and water in my my team he sucks
:3 kitty kitty

User Info: LeoAleph

3 years ago#25
Stealth Rocks. Rock type attacks in general.

User Info: Hrothdane

3 years ago#26
Because people overuse stealth rock.

Gamefreak either needs to get rid of it or add similar entry hazards for other types to even things out.

User Info: Kinger1000

3 years ago#27
Honestly, with the new Fairy Type taking out Dragons, I feel that Charizard might be more popular competitively this Gen

User Info: radred2004

3 years ago#28
Melkac posted...
Stealth Rock, Fire/Flying.

To build off this, bad defenses.

Kinger1000 posted...
Honestly, with the new Fairy Type taking out Dragons, I feel that Charizard might be more popular competitively this Gen

The only way he becomes more competitive is changing his type to fire/dragon. Other dragons have nothing to do with him. Bad defenses and 4x weakness will always cripple Charizard.
White: Daisy 1550 0892 3564 Gold: Gold 3268 1023 8138

User Info: Aysander

3 years ago#29
Charizard definitely needs a good +SpE or +SpA/+SpE move, I.E quiver dance, or a new equivalent.

Stealth Rock, Rock Slide, and Stone Edge availability, especially on faster pokes, doesn't help charizard. I imagine Protect/Overheat/Air Slash/Dragon Pulse Zard could work in doubles with Tailwind or Trickroom support, but he still has mediocre SpA and SpE compared to other run-of-the-mill fire types, such as Magmar and Moltres.

TBH, as much as I love fire types..I usually use them in doubles where I can couple them with an adequate partner to cover their weaknesses...but Doubles and Triples are an altogether different competitive scene compared to singles in some senses.

User Info: iKhanic

3 years ago#30
So much misinformation in this topic.

Charizard's defenses aren't bad, they are actually pretty good for a sweeper that's not legendary, no other fire starter but Typhlosion has better defenses.

Fire/Flying isn't a bad typing, it's actually pretty average. It only has 3 weaknesses, earthquake, spikes, and toxic spikes immunity, TWO 4x resistances, resistance to three different priority moves, and fighting resistances.

The problem is that solar power makes even resisted hits hurt badly.

Charizard's not a wall or anything, but people are pretty ignorant of its defensive decency.
Not changing this sig until we get a new main series Tales game released on a Nintendo console in the US
Dictator of the Zelda Wii U Board
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Can someone explain to me how Charizard "sucks?"

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived