This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Rate the new Pokemon Day 10 - Talonflame

#1gwithy16Posted 7/9/2013 12:49:30 PM
Rate Talonflame on a scale of 1-10 - Results (143 votes)
10 - It's amazing!
21.68% (31 votes)
31
9 - It's awesome!
23.08% (33 votes)
33
8 - It's great!
23.78% (34 votes)
34
7 - It's good!
16.08% (23 votes)
23
6 - It's average
8.39% (12 votes)
12
5 - It's below average
0.7% (1 votes)
1
4 - It's bad
2.8% (4 votes)
4
3 - It's really bad
0% (0 votes)
0
2 - It's terrible
0% (0 votes)
0
1 - One of the worst Pokemon ever made.
3.5% (5 votes)
5
This poll is now closed.
While we all eagerly await the next batch of Pokemon to be revealed, let's rate the ones that have been shown so far.

Today's Pokemon is Talonflame, the fire-flying evolution of Fletchling.

http://www.serebii.net/xy/talonflame.png

Feel free to discuss anything Talonflame-related so the topic stays up and we get a lot of votes.

==RESULTS==

Fletchling had a good performance. Let's see if Talonflame can do better than its pre-evo.


Amazing Pokemon (Avg. % is from 93-100)
None

Awesome Pokemon (Avg. % is from 85-92.9)
None

Great Pokemon (Avg. % is from 77-84.9)
Yveltal 82.5% (113 votes)
Clauncher 81.7% (66 votes)
Fennekin 79.3% (109 votes)
Chespin 77.3% (64 votes)

Good Pokemon (Avg. % is from 70-76.9)
Xerneas 76.0% (78 votes)
Honedge 74.6% (138 votes)
Fletchling 72.2% (98 votes)

Average Pokemon (Avg. % is from 63-69.9)
None

Below Average Pokemon (Avg. % is from 55-62.9)
Skrelp 62.9% (89 votes)
Sylveon 58.4% (188 votes)

Bad Pokemon (Avg. % is from 40-54.9)
None

Terrible Pokemon (Avg. % less than 40)
None

Thanks for participating!
---
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1832133/pavelski.gif
Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Can't Lose
#2LegendofDarkraiPosted 7/9/2013 12:53:52 PM
10/10 best gen 6 pokemon so far. Love it.
Always wanted a falcon pokemon
---
Specter of shadows, Ruler of the darkened moon, Uncontrollable ~Darkrai
#30Fallen_Angel0Posted 7/9/2013 1:21:17 PM(edited)
Since when was Sylveon so hated? I mean, she's not perfect, but worse than Skrelp? Ugh.
---
You know nothing, Jon Snow.
#4GATTJTPosted 7/9/2013 1:31:16 PM
From: 0Fallen_Angel0 | #003
Since when was Sylveon so hated? I mean, she's not perfect, but worse than Skrelp? Ugh.


To be fair, she got a LOT more votes, so high scores would be worth less.
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_xjBAd5G84
#5FuneralCakePosted 7/9/2013 1:32:15 PM
Giving it a 4 because

a) I'm not crazy about the design. It's okay, but not amazing.
2) DAT NAME
---
THAT'S MISS FUNERAL CAKE TO YOU
i don't want to do things. i want to not do things.
#6gzr9kPosted 7/9/2013 4:29:40 PM
7/10 by overall pokemon standards, 5/10 by gen 6 standards so far. A decent looking poke, but we really don't need fire/flying pokes, and that name is pretty cringeworthy. One of the less good gen 6 pokes revealed so far, but to be fair it has a lot of competition.
---
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice - Bill Cosby
#7TherianReturnsPosted 7/9/2013 5:38:04 PM
10/10
---
I am the only true Pokemon fan. Find me at: http://www.youtube.com/user/AdventOfTherian/about
#8mnkboy907Posted 7/9/2013 5:50:25 PM
7/10

It's good. The official artwork is definitely nice, but the in-game 3D model makes it look kinda ugly. Still, I like that the traditional early bird is breaking away from the Normal/Flying norm.
---
http://i.imgur.com/z7h3ZVX.jpg
"First time I got punched in the face, I was like "oh no", then I was like "this is a story"."
#9CakeOfLiesPosted 7/9/2013 5:52:07 PM
8/10.
I kinda like it.
And we've totally never had any Fire/Flying Pokemon.
---
I'm not easily impressed; I'm usually oblivious to whatever's in front of me.
Pokemon White 2 FC: 3139-7420-3142 - THIEF
#10andrewx72Posted 7/9/2013 5:52:27 PM
9/10

Design is great.
---
Don't eat blue melons.
Black 2 FC: 2022 7568 3773