This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What is your ideal number of legendaries?

#1LightningHawk90Posted 7/25/2013 6:48:04 PM
I feel like Gamefreak is going a bit overboard with the legendary pokemon the past few gens.

Gen I we had 5
Gen II we had 6
Gen III jumped up to 10
Gen IV had 14 (13 if you don't count Phione)
and Gen IV had 13.

I think Gen I or II was more ideal with 5 or 6..

What about you?
---
Hi. I'm RageKaiser. I'm here to ruin your unfunny topics.
#2X_Ayumi_XPosted 7/25/2013 6:48:30 PM
3.
That's my ideal number.
---
GT: Ayumi Spender || PS0: 4597 9585 4793
Only talk to me when I order you to. 3DS: 2921 9091 2567
#3DweezleMoonunitPosted 7/25/2013 6:49:38 PM
5-8
---
What does a nosy pepper do? It gets Jalapeno business.
Official Frank Zappa of Every Board
#4LightningHawk90(Topic Creator)Posted 7/25/2013 6:49:42 PM
X_Ayumi_X posted...
3.
That's my ideal number.


So you'd like Xerneas, Yveltal, and whatever the 3rd game one is?
---
Hi. I'm RageKaiser. I'm here to ruin your unfunny topics.
#5TigerDude7Posted 7/25/2013 6:50:29 PM
on my team I just carry two. Lucario and Darkrai. I'm not sure if Lucario is legendary though, so correct me if I'm wrong.
---
^_^
#6LightningHawk90(Topic Creator)Posted 7/25/2013 6:52:23 PM(edited)
TigerDude7 posted...
on my team I just carry two. Lucario and Darkrai. I'm not sure if Lucario is legendary though, so correct me if I'm wrong.


I do not count Lucario as legendary.
---
Hi. I'm RageKaiser. I'm here to ruin your unfunny topics.
#7X_Ayumi_XPosted 7/25/2013 6:54:38 PM
RageKaiser posted...
X_Ayumi_X posted...
3.
That's my ideal number.


So you'd like Xerneas, Yveltal, and whatever the 3rd game one is?


I'd rather not have Xenass and it being replaced with something else, Yveltal and whatever that would be on the 3rd game's cover.
---
GT: Ayumi Spender || PS0: 4597 9585 4793
Only talk to me when I order you to. 3DS: 2921 9091 2567
#8FuneralCakePosted 7/25/2013 6:56:40 PM
I don't really care, honestly. The number of legendaries does not matter to me at all. I know a lot of people like to complain about "too many legendaries," but I just don't see what's wrong with it. Yeah, sure, the first couple of gens only had a few, comparatively, but that doesn't mean the rest of the series should follow.
---
THAT'S MISS FUNERAL CAKE TO YOU
love me like it's prom night
#9LightningHawk90(Topic Creator)Posted 7/25/2013 6:58:02 PM
FuneralCake posted...
I don't really care, honestly. The number of legendaries does not matter to me at all. I know a lot of people like to complain about "too many legendaries," but I just don't see what's wrong with it. Yeah, sure, the first couple of gens only had a few, comparatively, but that doesn't mean the rest of the series should follow.


The only real problem I see with it, is that if we have alot of legendary pokemon, I feel like it leaves less room for pokemon that have actual evolution stages.
---
Hi. I'm RageKaiser. I'm here to ruin your unfunny topics.
#10Noble-HeartPosted 7/25/2013 7:01:03 PM
6 would be my ideal number.

Cover legendaries
Trio
and obligatory cutie pokemon
---
Official Crystal of the Pokemon X and Y board
"I like girls. But now... it's about justice."