This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What Pokemon do you think didn't need an evo?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. What Pokemon do you think didn't need an evo?

User Info: Firemaster5

3 years ago#51
CrusnikCain posted...
I love Rhyperior even though i don't think giving Rhydon a evolution was necessary but i do not like Porygon-z and lickilicky

If not for the Eviolite boost, Lickitung getting an evolution was unnecessary design-wise.
FuneralCake posted...
All of the ones in gen 4, because gen 4 sucks.

"Sorry to be frank but if you were interested in JRPGs and bought a 360 only then you flat out chose the wrong system."-Thamauturge

User Info: Gsus_94

3 years ago#52
I don't think Chansey needed one, especially with candidates like farfetch'd from the first gen
3DS FC: 0473 7779 6792
ACNL: Melo from Besaid

User Info: Chaos_Missile

3 years ago#53
Rhydon, because I'd rather Rhydon get a retyping to Ground/Steel due to how armor-liked its design is in addition to having the primary colour of steel type Pokemons.

Kingdra didnt need to exist since Seedra was badass. A retyping for Seedra would've been better imo.

I wont deny Licklicky's existence confused me. Also Tangrowth. After a while, however, I'm fine with the latter. Still not so much with the former.
Action speaks louder than words. But words, when used right, overwhelm any action - Me, 2006
Let's put a smile on that face - The Joker, 2008
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. What Pokemon do you think didn't need an evo?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived