This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Which secondary type triangle do you think is more plausable now?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Which secondary type triangle do you think is more plausable now?

User Info: ZTIger5

ZTIger5
3 years ago#11
Golurkcanfly posted...
ZTIger5 posted...
Golurkcanfly posted...
Why not Fire/Fairy, Water/Dark, and Grass/Rock

Fire > Grass > Water > Fire

Fairy > Dark > Rock > Fire


The Rock-type would neutralize Fennekin's effectiveness against Chespin. The point of a secondary cycle is to make them strong against each other without interfering with the already established hierarchy of Fire-Grass-Water.


Remember, we did have that messed up Pseudo-Triangle in Gen 4. So I wouldn't doubt if Game Freak did that again.


Yeah, that one wasn't entirely thought out, but it did give us some really good starters at least.
Playing: Fire Emblem Awakening, Pokemon White 2, Bioshock Infinite
I believe in everlasting life in Heaven.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Which secondary type triangle do you think is more plausable now?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived