This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Which secondary type triangle do you think is more plausable now?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Which secondary type triangle do you think is more plausable now?
2 years ago#11
Golurkcanfly posted...
ZTIger5 posted...
Golurkcanfly posted...
Why not Fire/Fairy, Water/Dark, and Grass/Rock

Fire > Grass > Water > Fire

Fairy > Dark > Rock > Fire


The Rock-type would neutralize Fennekin's effectiveness against Chespin. The point of a secondary cycle is to make them strong against each other without interfering with the already established hierarchy of Fire-Grass-Water.


Remember, we did have that messed up Pseudo-Triangle in Gen 4. So I wouldn't doubt if Game Freak did that again.


Yeah, that one wasn't entirely thought out, but it did give us some really good starters at least.
---
Playing: Fire Emblem Awakening, Pokemon White 2, Bioshock Infinite
I believe in everlasting life in Heaven.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Which secondary type triangle do you think is more plausable now?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived