This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

I dislike X/normal and normal/X types

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. I dislike X/normal and normal/X types
2 years ago#21
Sloth9230 posted...
I agree 100% that it makes no sense. You can't specialize in fire magic and be considered normal. However, I don't really care either way.

---
http://i.imgur.com/GUtJDs7.jpg
Official Jiminy Cricket of the Kingdom Hearts III Boards
2 years ago#22
mnkboy907 posted...
I don't mind it, because most of the part Normals look like they're part Normal. Like Pyroar. Get rid of the fiery mane, and its color scheme totally becomes that of mundane looking animal, thus part Normal. Now, if the body had the same color scheme as the mane, then I'd expect it to be pure Fire.

---
Pangoro and Noivern FTW
http://fav.me/d5r70a1
2 years ago#23
I think part Normal-types make some sense. They're not entirely elemental Pokemon. Not to mention a Normal-type grants an automatic type immunity.

In Doctor Who, there is "slightly psychic" paper, why not have slightly psychic Pokemon?
---
4e is not D&D, but WoW making a Disguise check.
Pokemon Black Friend Code: 0605-2800-9952; Trainer Name: Solace; First Pokemon (roleplaying): Snivy (Monty)
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. I dislike X/normal and normal/X types

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived