This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

...only having 70 new pokemon is kind of a bummer

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. ...only having 70 new pokemon is kind of a bummer

User Info: MrJinxed

MrJinxed
3 years ago#11
ChibiDeidara posted...
James-Noraa posted...
I understand we had quite a bit in 5th gen but 70 is dropping the ball.

though Greninja is already one of my all time favorites.

they could've went without mega evos honestly. That way we would have actual evos for older pokemon.


Quality over Quantity


Yh but they aint quality lol. Almost all of them wont see any use in the metagame unlike gen5 which had pokes such as conkeldurr, excadrill, hydreigon, muskeeters.

User Info: ZLn13

ZLn13
3 years ago#12
Its not really that bad, idk I just have a feeling that nintendo has more to reveal about the game then we know now but if 69 or 70 new pokemon is where its at then its ok.

User Info: Strain42

Strain42
3 years ago#13
ChibiDeidara posted...
James-Noraa posted...
I understand we had quite a bit in 5th gen but 70 is dropping the ball.

though Greninja is already one of my all time favorites.

they could've went without mega evos honestly. That way we would have actual evos for older pokemon.


Quality over Quantity


Once again though, that argument doesn't work here for two reasons

1. You can't conclusively say that we'd have worse Pokemon this Gen if they had made more of them
2. That argument only works for people who actually think the Gen 6 Pokemon are of good quality. Those that don't like most of them are now stuck with low quality AND quantity.
Don't forget to check out my MegaTen themed webcomics at http://www.drunkduck.com/user/Strain42/ (Currently Updating: Persona 4TW Add-On M-F)
5069-5089-2020

User Info: James-Noraa

James-Noraa
3 years ago#14
YMKF posted...
They can't go direct evolutions for older pokemons. That would break the game balance totally if the evos are permanent.


Not having mega evos at all like they should get rid of the megas and give pokemon that actually need evolutions evolutions.

User Info: ChibiDeidara

ChibiDeidara
3 years ago#15
Strain42 posted...
ChibiDeidara posted...
James-Noraa posted...
I understand we had quite a bit in 5th gen but 70 is dropping the ball.

though Greninja is already one of my all time favorites.

they could've went without mega evos honestly. That way we would have actual evos for older pokemon.


Quality over Quantity


Once again though, that argument doesn't work here for two reasons

1. You can't conclusively say that we'd have worse Pokemon this Gen if they had made more of them
2. That argument only works for people who actually think the Gen 6 Pokemon are of good quality. Those that don't like most of them are now stuck with low quality AND quantity.


Very Good points... yeah i understand =)
Maybe you should worry less about the tides, who've already made up their mind about killing you, and worry more about me, who's still mulling it over -Azula-

User Info: Golurkcanfly

Golurkcanfly
3 years ago#16
James-Noraa posted...
YMKF posted...
They can't go direct evolutions for older pokemons. That would break the game balance totally if the evos are permanent.


Not having mega evos at all like they should get rid of the megas and give pokemon that actually need evolutions evolutions.


However, Mega Evolutions were implemented because fans so desperately wanted certain 3-stage Pokemon to evolve again or change typing. This was their answer as to not break the formula.
Official Amnesiac Darkrai of the Pokemon X Board
You know why spiders know how to spin webs when they hatch? Because F*** You! That's why.

User Info: Mr Stick

Mr Stick
3 years ago#17
Strain42 posted...
ChibiDeidara posted...
James-Noraa posted...
I understand we had quite a bit in 5th gen but 70 is dropping the ball.

though Greninja is already one of my all time favorites.

they could've went without mega evos honestly. That way we would have actual evos for older pokemon.


Quality over Quantity


Once again though, that argument doesn't work here for two reasons

1. You can't conclusively say that we'd have worse Pokemon this Gen if they had made more of them
2. That argument only works for people who actually think the Gen 6 Pokemon are of good quality. Those that don't like most of them are now stuck with low quality AND quantity.


But what about GAME quality over POKEMON quantity?

I don't understand why people are forgetting there is a game part to Pokemon.

And that most people are just going to use their old favorites anyway. All new Pokemon do is add like 4-5 new Pokemon for you to add to your list of "pokemon I will use", if even. Mega Evolutions will even make it so you can get more 'old favorites' due to their new forms.

YMKF posted...
They can't go direct evolutions for older pokemons. That would break the game balance totally if the evos are permanent.


So I take it you believe Gen 2 and Gen 4 don't exist?
~ I'm Always Fighting the Gravity ~
360: MoldyClay87 ;; 3DS: 3050-8737-8491
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. ...only having 70 new pokemon is kind of a bummer

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived