This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Would You Rather Mega Evolutions Were Natural Permanent Evolutions?

#11JJ2036Posted 10/7/2013 1:09:59 PM
Keep both just make them alternate evolution, the stone can be used just like the other stones(ie use charizardnite x stone on charmeleon).
---
GT: JayIsDaTruth
#12vital_tundraPosted 10/7/2013 1:10:40 PM
Natural ones for Pokemon that need it.
---
3DS friend code: 1848-2159-5405 (Richie)
#13GolurkcanflyPosted 10/7/2013 1:11:18 PM
For non-3rd stage Pokemon yes, only if they were not insanely strong. Mega Mawile, I'm looking at you.
---
Official Amnesiac Darkrai of the Pokemon X Board
You know why spiders know how to spin webs when they hatch? Because F*** You! That's why.
#14DanMil05Posted 10/7/2013 1:12:40 PM
M4nnimal posted...
Not a fan of a permanent 4th evolution, tbh.


When did mega's start evolving?
---
Pokemon Black FC: 0948 1415 0414 Daniel
#15Sume_GaiPosted 10/7/2013 9:12:06 PM
Defnitely depends on the pokemon in question. Starters, legendaries, and already potent pokemon like lucario work best under the restrictions of Mega Evolution.

Lower end pokemon that don't evolve or get a very unique ability, typing or other gimmick (absol mainly) would be better served with permanent evos (though perhaps not with the existing mega design persay)
#16jEr3mYPosted 10/7/2013 9:13:42 PM
I want Mega Absol to be permanent.. That thing is awesome!!

Apart from the rest... they should have just ditched 'em and make regular evolutions for stuff that needed it....
---
Non-Specific Action Figure has to be in the next Super Smash Bros game. If you agree, send me a message. Number of people who agree: 19 - updated 27 August 2013
#17FowhawkPosted 10/7/2013 9:14:58 PM
If it was already a stage 3 Pokemon, then only Mega evolve. If not, Absol, Mawile, etc. then have it plain evolve.
---
Imagine giving a child 100 new toys but he throws a tantrum because 5 or 6 of them he doesn't like the look of. This is also known as the Pokemon fanbase.