This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Is it lazy not to make every Pokemon have a mega evolution?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Is it lazy not to make every Pokemon have a mega evolution?
2 years ago#1
Don't see a reason why some have one and some don't.

Do you even count theseas new Pokemon? Do they count as a new entry in the Pokedex? You can't even see them outside of battle.

Need more new Pokemon!
---
3754-7115-0719
2 years ago#2
I don't think it is lazy to not have every line have a Mega Evolution, but I do think it is lazy if it turns out that every starter does not have a Mega Evolution. That seems a little ridiculous.
---
Can a dead man (claws shoot out) kill? - Wolverine, x2 Wolverine's Revenge
2 years ago#3
If you think not having a Mega for all the 300+ fully evolved Pokémon is "lazy"...
---
Oooh, MM, he be tryin' you, dawg. He be tryin' you. Best mind you biiiiiiiz-ness. ~KMA
*triple z snap* ~AluminumTicket
2 years ago#4
I think it's certainly telling of Game Freak's priorities when not all starters get Megas, while Charizard gets two of them.
---
Judicoid
Judicator-variant Android
2 years ago#5
Gastroid posted...
I think it's certainly telling of Game Freak's priorities when not all starters get Megas, while Charizard gets two of them.


We don't know that not all starters get Megas do we? Unless you're talking about the Kalos starters.
---
Thank you, gentlemen! Someday, I will repay you. Unless, of course, I can't find you or if I forget.
2 years ago#6
Nope because some Pokemon need some more evolutions before they get a Mega Evolution.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Is it lazy not to make every Pokemon have a mega evolution?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived