This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Fairy types: too many or too few?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Fairy types: too many or too few?
2 years ago#1
What's your opinion on the amount of fairy type pokemon? - Results (173 votes)
It was a horrible idea to create this type begin with! There should have been zero!
7.51% (13 votes)
Too many, for a debut appearance there should have been less. Test the waters a little you know?
2.31% (4 votes)
Just the right amount.
27.75% (48 votes)
Too few! this is the debut of a new type after all!
43.35% (75 votes)
It was a brilliant idea to create this type! Every new pokemon in the game should have been fairy type!
2.89% (5 votes)
I'm mixed. Sometimes it felt like there was nothing but fairys other times I was left wondering where they were.
16.18% (28 votes)
This poll is now closed.
Personally I'm choice #6.
2 years ago#2
This is the only correct choice: "It was a brilliant idea to create this type! Every new pokemon in the game should have been fairy type!"
FC: 2552-0423-5883
2 years ago#3
Too few. I mean sure, they're the most represented type this gen, but there's still comparatively few. I feel like there should have been a lot more recons to make older Pokemon more viable and fresh with a new type, such as Mismagius, Vanilluxe, Illumise/Volbeat, etc. Feels like a missed opportunity.
That's no way to talk to somebody as good-looking as me! - Barter Bear
2 years ago#4
How many fairy types are there currently?
2 years ago#5
I'm gonna say to few good ones. Other than Xerneas, the only good ones are previous gen pokemon who have been given fairy typing
FC 3883-5502-4640. PM if you add me
2 years ago#6
Too many bad ones really. Too few good, IMO.


Probably the only 4 I see possibly in OU. Am I missing any?
'Come fight beside me,' I said to myself, and although it doesn't make sense, I held my own hand as a small sign of trust, and together I made my defense.
2 years ago#7
I feel there's a balanced amount in the game now.

Just very few that could be used competitively due to their overall lacking stats.
2 years ago#8
There is no real physically defensive fairys. It really sucks. Faeries resist fight ,dark, bug and immune to drg. Most of the ou of these types are physical. So they end up 2ohko most of the fairys anyway.

We have enough special walls in the game and we have the freaking fat queen blissey.

However i like that it bumped up some pokemon who deserved it. Psychics got a buff too since most of them learn dazzle.
"With only laughter can you win"
add me 3ds fc 0447-6293-3999 for pokemon x/y safari. Send a pm if you are not added
2 years ago#9
Let's see, we have...

Mime Jr. (I think?)/Mr. Mime
Ralts/Kirlia/Gardevoir/Mega Gardevoir (Since a lot of Pokes change type on evolution I'm counting it separately)
Mawile/Mega Mawile
Dianice (or whatever that event legendary is called)

So that's what...36 Pokemon?

Yeah, that's a good introduction. Beats Steel and Dark getting like...4-5 each on intro >_> I mean back then Ghost and Dragon were around the same number but that was just as least with Ghost anyway. While I'dve liked more variety in the new Fairies (Fairy, Rock/Fairy, Steel/Fairy and Electric/Fairy are the only type combos of brand new Fairies), the large amount of retcons (Psychic/Fairy, Fairy/Flying, Normal/Fairy, Water/Fairy, Grass/Fairy) mean the actual type does have some variety when you're not being fussy and using only new Pokemon.
'Success rates are but scientific theory. A brave heart will defy any odds!'
'Don't beg for things, do it yourself or else you won't get anything.'
2 years ago#10
too few with mixed typings that are useable and most are wallers of some sort.
3ds friend code: 5086-1083-5381
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Fairy types: too many or too few?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived