This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

The 'Single-stage Pokemon' unappreciation topic

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. The 'Single-stage Pokemon' unappreciation topic
2 years ago#1
Just to clarify, this is not a topic that looks down on the single stage Pokemon like Druddigon and Klefki, but rather the Single Stages itself. Every pokemon except legendarys should evolve. Alot of pokemon would have been so much more useful and cooler if they weren't stuck in this one single stage. (Dunsparce, Carbink, etc) Let's show our unappreciation to the fact that some pokemon gets the shorter end of the stick because GF doesn't feel like giving every pokemon an evolution!
---
Blue is Greener than Purple
FC: 3823-9377-5845
2 years ago#2
It's a crime that Hawlucha only has one form.
---
Pokemon Y Friend Safari Pokemon: Dedenne, Electabuzz, Zebstricka
3DS FC: 3024 - 5019 - 8681 (PM me to add me)
2 years ago#3
I don't believe Rotom, Skarmory, Tropius, Klefki, other more full-evolved-looking ones and any of the Mega Evo recipients should have evolutions, but stuff like Carbink...

Carbink.... why?
---
My 3DS FC
Rotom: 3308-5985-4794
2 years ago#4
This is a nice idea... For some Single-Stage Pokemon, I find them to be special without evolutions, but I agree many need them. Plus, it never deters me either way!

I still prefer Scyther to Scizor anyway. xD
---
3DS FC: 5112-3533-9935 ~ Name: Ross ~ Pokemon XY Name: Beta
I'm also a Let's Player on YouTube! http://www.youtube.com/user/BetaNights
2 years ago#5
I like 90% of the single stage pokes as is, tbh

maybe a smeargle evo with decent attacking stats to make it useable ingame (banned from competitive probably, but idc). smeargle sounds fun, but its lame that you cant do anything but support moves with it
2 years ago#6
In my opinion, single stage Pokemon have their charm. And Electabuzz, Tangela, and Magmar were actually some of my favorite Pokemon until they decided to ruin them with horrible looking evolutions.

But the best example has to be Togetic. That Pokemon looked amazing, then they make a new evolution... Seriously, what even is that? It looks like a giant floating testicle with wings.

If they want to make new Pokemon, make new Pokemon. But please don't screw over old gen Pokemon that were actually good.
---
FC: 3282-3099-5273
2 years ago#7
Hawlucha doesn't need an evolution
---
4639-9811-6534 -Pokemon X/Y Friend Code. PM if you add. Trainer name: Marii
Friend Safari: Grumpig, Sigilyph, Girafarig
2 years ago#8
RotomGuy3 posted...
I don't believe Rotom, Skarmory, Tropius, Klefki, other more full-evolved-looking ones and any of the Mega Evo recipients should have evolutions, but stuff like Carbink...

Carbink.... why?


Rotom has it's forms. While i think fully evolved looking Pokemon don't really need an evolution that much, mabey a Mega tho. And what do you mean Klefki looks fully evolved?

Also, *flame shield*
I think some of the fully evolved looking single stagers like Skarm and Tropius should get pre-evos...
---
Blue is Greener than Purple
FC: 3823-9377-5845
2 years ago#9
Many non-evolving Pokes are as strong, or stronger, than full-evolved Pokes.
2 years ago#10
If anything i'd like farfetchd to get a special item like Super Stick (leek) which inreases his base stats by 50%,
minus HP
---
PSN:Nitemare667
3DS FC: 4313-0558-2400
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. The 'Single-stage Pokemon' unappreciation topic

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived