This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Agree/Disagree: Shinies should have never existed in the first place

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Agree/Disagree: Shinies should have never existed in the first place
1 year ago#1
Agree or Disagree: Shiny Pokemon should have never existed! - Results (148 votes)
I agree, because it makes it hard for some players trying to trade and get somewhere with the games
5.41% (8 votes)
8
I disagree, shinies are kind of exciting and add a little more "flavor" to the games
52.7% (78 votes)
78
Simply put, I agree (if your reason doesn't match any of the other poll options, then please feel free to explain)
4.73% (7 votes)
7
Simply put, I disagree (same as the above option)
2.7% (4 votes)
4
Why are you asking this, TC!?!?!?!?
2.03% (3 votes)
3
As if this is even a problem...
8.78% (13 votes)
13
POKEBANNNNNNK!
23.65% (35 votes)
35
This poll is now closed.
I'm just curious about what kind of poll results we'll get here.
---
3DS FC: 3668-8937-4809
My Pokemon X/Y Friend Safari: Meditite, Sawk, and Breloom. In-Game Name: Melody
1 year ago#2
I disagree, but they should be much easier to obtain, like 1/128 odds maybe.
---
3DS FC: 5412-9912-6820 | IGN: Neo (Y) Makoto (X) | TSV: 1879 |
http://i.imgur.com/G5Jgq3s.png | http://i.imgur.com/nSudXNv.jpg
1 year ago#3
Why do we add answers like that last one when we want to know if people agree or disagree
---
3DS: 1134-8319-9231. Sunkern, Swadloon, Maractus.
Creator of Bank Legendary tiers. Proof: http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/696959-pokemon-x/68248309/770168098
1 year ago#4
LagoonTheCursed posted...
Why do we add answers like that last one when we want to know if people agree or disagree


B-because...it's fun.
---
3DS FC: 3668-8937-4809
My Pokemon X/Y Friend Safari: Meditite, Sawk, and Breloom. In-Game Name: Melody
1 year ago#5
It was fine, but they never should have switched to a Shiny ID.
---
X: Serena; Y: Ruki; 3DS FC: Thomas 5069-4431-9392 Friend Safari - Water: Floatzel, Bibarel, Frogadier
NNID: shadowlands; Yeah, I'm a crossplayer. Deal with it.
1 year ago#6
Disagree, but I would change something about them.

Instead of just one palette swap, maybe there could have been a bunch of different versions for each pokemon.
1 year ago#7
They should just be way easier to obtain. Some pokemon have awesome pallete swaps.
1 year ago#8
The Red Gyarados was a plot point in one game and an introductory plot device in another.
They've already proven necessary.
---
3DS FC: 3050 - 7604 - 7991 Friend Safari: Octillery, Floatzel, Frogadier
1 year ago#9
They add no competitive advantage, yet are rewarding when you run in to one since they are so rare. They are fine the way they are. If they are competitively better than regular colored pokemon, then I would have a problem with them
---
3DS Friend Code: 5413-0006-7792
PM me so I can add you as well!
1 year ago#10
Definitely agree.

There is the novelty of finding or hatching a different colored Pokémon, but it would be better if players could just create their own palette swaps.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Agree/Disagree: Shinies should have never existed in the first place

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived