alien21195Posted 2/6/2013 10:51:44 PM |
Which style strikes your fancy? - Results (112 votes)
A few, really large, mission based, exploration heavy levels, ala Sunshine and 64
60.71%
68
Numerous, small, linear Galaxy-like levels with heavy platforming
27.68%
31
Other (Describe how you would like to see it done)
11.61%
13
Note: The Super Mario 64 style will have SOME platforming, but it won't be a big focus of the game, much like Sunshine and 64. The levels would obviously be WAY larger than the older levels, with the power of the Wii U. Also, some of the levels in the Galaxy style will dabble in exploration, much like some worlds in those games did. --- "This quote is not inspiring nor funny"- alien21195 People who were left disappointed by this sig:0 |
Indigo209Posted 2/8/2013 2:51:14 PM | Personally, I'd prefer linear, platforming-heavy levels. I play Mario games for swift and action-packed platforming, not exploration, collect-a-thons, or interaction with NPCs (I'm looking at you, Sunshine.). However, if Nintendo found a way to create a third type of gameplay that incorporates the best of both styles, then I'm all for it.
Still, I voted for linearity. |
DrunkenWhalePosted 2/9/2013 12:16:31 PM | Give me a bit of a mix. Heavy platforming, but exploration heavy.
64 and Sunshine spoiled me, I just don't want another point A to point B 3D Mario. If you're going to make me go in a linear game, do it as a 2D plaftormer like NSMB. |
Blazekicker27Posted 2/9/2013 2:19:36 PM | I'd like a mix of the two the most, with both platforming and exploration. If I had to choose one of the styles, though, I'd prefer exploration. --- Official Houndoom of the Pokemon XY boards. http://i.imgur.com/rNgxY.png |
Smashman45Posted 2/9/2013 5:09:13 PM | The best way to go, I feel, would be a solid balance/middle-ground between exploration, and pure platforming. Appease both sides. If I could choose only one, it would be the linear style with heavy platforming. It allows for some really creative and crazy level designs which I felt made the Galaxy games shine. --- 3DS FC: 1891-1237-7464 |
alien21195 (Topic Creator) Posted 2/11/2013 3:40:05 PM | While I agree a mix of the two styles would be amazing, we have yet to see what it would be like. More than likely nintendo will just pick one or the other anyways or not balance them quite properly, however. I also wanted to see which was the preferred of the two, or what other crazy ideas people could come up with. That's mainly the reason I didn't include a "both" option. --- "This quote is not inspiring nor funny"- alien21195 People who were left disappointed by this sig:0 |
HammerBrozPosted 2/15/2013 7:44:34 PM | I prefer a mix. There could be larger levels that had more exploration and secrets to uncover and a few mini levels with Galaxy style platforming. |
HeroFromKryptonPosted 2/18/2013 10:47:06 PM | The levels in the Galaxy games were all relatively large, even considering they consisted of mostly groups of planetoids. |
jneal57Posted 2/19/2013 7:51:03 AM | Sunshine got it right with the stages. Any linear stage was a bonus stage. But if we get bonus linear stages I want them to be like galaxy stages. --- http://downloads.khinsider.com/?u=955240 |
Waver92Posted 2/19/2013 12:02:41 PM | I dunno, my answer might be weak.
I would like a mixture of the two. Maybe have large exploratory levels with standard objectives. Then have some sections and objectives in the levels that are heavily platformer based. Somehow melding these two gently. --- Brawl FC: 5069-3752-2714 /3DS FC: 2964-8605-0439 Random Warning: HEAD FOR THE HILLS AND PUT YOUR ARMOR ON! THE FANBOYS ARE COMING!!! |