How would you feel about being limited to 1 legendary per deck?

#1thedeadman568Posted 5/7/2014 3:06:38 PM
While I realize that legendaries aren't magical win-the-game-cards, most of them will destroy you if you can't get rid of them fast enough.
Now having one of those trump cards is fine, but when one player can put out 3 of them in 3 turns while the other player doesn't even own any, the game is pretty much over,
because unless your opponent is completely incompetent, you'll probably already have used most removal by the time the big legendaries come out.

Limiting them to 1 per deck would encourage people actually thinking about which one to use, increase deck diversity (no more rag and sylvanas in the same deck) and balance the game toward people, who might not own all the big ones.

Off course, it would also mean they'd have to buff some of the legendarys, to make them worth the single space. (i.e old Nat Pagle would be fine, since you're giving up some immense firepower for the additional draw)
Maybe they could make legendaries cards you build decks around, not cards you just throw in for good measure.

I believe it would make legendaries more meaningful, while balancing the game.

How do you feel about this?
---
do what a man would and show of your manhood
#2ShadyDudePosted 5/7/2014 3:07:58 PM
really bad
#3xFilthPosted 5/7/2014 3:11:28 PM
Miracle rogue continues to dominate even harder.
#4bobguydude1Posted 5/7/2014 3:24:31 PM
lol warrior
---
YOU BROKE RNG!!?!?!?!?!?!? NOOOOOOOOO!!!!- insane_pyro74
#5SelitePosted 5/7/2014 4:16:33 PM(edited)
You'd see a lot less legendaries imo

If the others weren't buffed I reckon everyone would just play Rag, Ysera and Sylv.
---
Random Hearthstone, CoD and Minecraft gameplay: http://www.youtube.com/user/selite?feature=mhee
#6anythingisfinePosted 5/7/2014 3:48:50 PM
I don't have an legendaries in my deck, the few I have are not great, other then the rag I got last night that I will add. I hate when I fight a deck and they have tons of legendaries and I feel like they only won because of them. (close games where sometimes it tips the scale in there favor, not all the time)

with all that being said I think this is a bad idea.
---
favorite bible quote, Psalm 137.8/9: Happy is he who repays you for what you have done to us, he who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks
#7pegusus123456Posted 5/7/2014 3:50:13 PM
Selite posted...
You'd see a lot less legendaries imo


Well, duh.
---
http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif
http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif
#8NeedMoreMoneyPosted 5/7/2014 3:53:52 PM
bobguydude1 posted...
lol warrior

---
http://sc2.jimluc.com/11402-0.png
#9Chielz0rPosted 5/7/2014 3:54:16 PM
It would hit some classes a lot harder then others.
#10thedeadman568(Topic Creator)Posted 5/7/2014 4:07:24 PM
Chielz0r posted...
It would hit some classes a lot harder then others.


So they need to be buffed. The fact that this is true already proves there's something wrong with the way legendaries work with some classes.
The way it is now, if you don't have certain legendaries, you might as well not play some classes.
---
do what a man would and show of your manhood