This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What does Firefox have over Chrome?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. What does Firefox have over Chrome?

User Info: RC Cruz me

RC Cruz me
4 years ago#1
Think I might just switch now that Chrome has a ton of add ons now, didn't switch over in the beginning when Chrome didn't have add ons
http://rcizzle.tumblr.com/ - http://backloggery.com/RCizzle65
http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lp3di6HrVJ1qb4xnqo1_400.gif http://imgh.us/rcizzle65.png

User Info: Orestes417

Orestes417
4 years ago#2
Still has more addons on the firefox side, the UI may be more to the user's taste and it's not tied to google.
Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.

User Info: Starks

Starks
4 years ago#3
A better add-on API and ecosystem.

There are plenty of add-ons, but quality is less than Firefox.
i7-2630QM | 8GB | 500GB | GT 555M | Advanced-N | 1080p Matte | Linux 3.4-rc1
http://i.imgur.com/Y6b1z.jpg

User Info: tehdewm

tehdewm
4 years ago#4
It has much more instances of being slow!

Seriously though, it has a lot more add ons, and better developed add ons in general.
Some say one or the other are ram hogs, in my experience they both use a sizeable amount of ram, but that is not a huge deal to me. Ram is there to be used, unless you have a low end pc I suppose.

User Info: __Crazy__

__Crazy__
4 years ago#5
Firefox uses significantly less memory, has more/better addons, and there are some functional differences (such as how tabs are resized, search results in the location bar, etc...) that increase productivity by quite a bit in my opinion. If only Firefox Sync was as good as Chrome Sync...
http://i.imgur.com/t5wZl.gif

User Info: Dragnfyr

Dragnfyr
4 years ago#6
Since Chrome puts each tab in a seperate process I think most people think Chrome uses less RAM.
Asus M4A88TD-M | Phenom II X4 B55@3.80GHz | 8GB DDR3-1333 | 40GB+64GB SSD | Corsair TX650 | eVGA GTX 470@750/1800 | Samsung T240 | Win 7 x64 | MacBook Air 11.6

User Info: cody4783

cody4783
4 years ago#7
Chrome, especially Chrome WITH addons, bleeds just as much, if not more RAM than Firefox on the average day. And in my experience, Chrome seems to bog down worse with addons, while Firefox stays stable under similar circumstances.

So, I tend to end up running Chrome without addons just so it functions better, and at that point, Firefox running with addons does much better, IMO.
PC: http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn233/cody4783/cody4783.jpg
http://steamcard.com/do/nxe/cody48.png

User Info: zxelman

zxelman
4 years ago#8
With add-ons out of the question, user UI is very subjective. There's only a few times when discussing convenience can be a matter of fact between the two. Me and my friend are neck-and-neck with Firefox and Chrome, proving each other wrong sometimes. Can't really say which wins here in interface-discussion.

Add-on wise, Firefox I feel wins here. Chrome still gets a little buggy with some add-ons. But I'm not a hardcore "internet-surfer", so I can't say too much.
www.notebookcheck.net/Computer-Games-on-Laptop-Graphic-Cards.13849.0.html
Best way to determine what each laptop GPU can run on each game. Look for yours in CP

User Info: Kalirion

Kalirion
4 years ago#9
Can't stand Chrome UI. But then I'm one of the people whose desktop is full of icons for quick access, instead of looking superclean with just "Recycle Bin".
Don't be scared of nightmares; make them be scared of you.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. What does Firefox have over Chrome?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived