This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

AMD FX-8350, is their unnecessary bias against AMD?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. AMD FX-8350, is their unnecessary bias against AMD?
2 years ago#1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eu8Sekdb-IE

https://teksyndicate.com/videos/amd-fx-8350-vs-intel-3570k-vs-3770k-vs-3820-gaming-and-xsplit-streaming-benchmarks

It seems like Intel CPU's aren't always winning across the board

You think their is media bias where Intel has bought out alot of the reviews?

Cherry pick benchmarks?

Intel's compiler has a cripple their code path when it's not an Intel CPU
http://www.agner.org/optimize/blog/read.php?i=49

I wonder how pervasive bias like this is within the software industry?
---
Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp 'Once Upon A Time in Mexico'
2 years ago#2
From: KamenRiderBlade | #001
Cherry pick benchmarks?


Yes on both sides.
---
Xbox LIVE Gamertag: Onyx Spartan II
The Timurids will never find me in America! - BlueYoshi579
2 years ago#3
Performance is the only thing I care about.
---
/|\ http://i.imgur.com/hK9c1lo.jpg?1
\|/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vE7x0WLz7SY
2 years ago#4
The bias is understandable when it comes to gaming.
---
http://i.imgur.com/J0lvB6S.jpg | http://i.imgur.com/DoHj9yA.jpg | http://youtu.be/YXkx-PSwbG4
2 years ago#5
So how big of a sample of games would there need to be benchmarked to get a more complete picture?

20 / 40 / 100?
---
Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp 'Once Upon A Time in Mexico'
2 years ago#6
All of them.
AMD's CPUs are fine for some things, but absolute garbage for others. It's those others that make the difference.
---
Want that Shield!
Ball and Cup on ps mobile has framerate issues. -stargazer64
2 years ago#7
DarkZV2Beta posted...
All of them.
AMD's CPUs are fine for some things, but absolute garbage for others. It's those others that make the difference.


But that's the problem. It's probably not garbage for other things, Intel has just used their money and market dominance to stack the deck. Actually read the last link and look at the absolute bull-crap Intel pulls to maintain their near-monopoly. It's disgusting.
2 years ago#8
GreenMage7 posted...
DarkZV2Beta posted...
All of them.
AMD's CPUs are fine for some things, but absolute garbage for others. It's those others that make the difference.


But that's the problem. It's probably not garbage for other things, Intel has just used their money and market dominance to stack the deck. Actually read the last link and look at the absolute bull-crap Intel pulls to maintain their near-monopoly. It's disgusting.


It's business.
---
"Tren, forget the men, we gotta beat up Om, Zet, and YD cause they stole <Insert name here> secks hack."
2 years ago#9
jacob5622 posted...
GreenMage7 posted...
DarkZV2Beta posted...
All of them.
AMD's CPUs are fine for some things, but absolute garbage for others. It's those others that make the difference.


But that's the problem. It's probably not garbage for other things, Intel has just used their money and market dominance to stack the deck. Actually read the last link and look at the absolute bull-crap Intel pulls to maintain their near-monopoly. It's disgusting.


It's business.


If you have to play dirty to maintain your monopoly, there is something fundamentally wrong IMO.
---
Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp 'Once Upon A Time in Mexico'
2 years ago#10
I have an FX-8350 and it's really not as bad at gaming as people make it out to be. I also don't have mine stock though, it's at 4.8Ghz and it pretty much stomps everything I throw at it.
---
Divided by night...
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. AMD FX-8350, is their unnecessary bias against AMD?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived