This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What's a better alternative to Chrome: WaterFox or Pale Moon?

#1__Cam__Posted 8/20/2013 11:47:20 AM
FireFox is (for some reason) more resource-intensive than Chrome, and I'm on a pretty fast rig. My primary reasons for switching are privacy and security, though I know since they're more lightweight, I'll get a faster browser.
You're awesome.
#2SinisterSlayPosted 8/20/2013 11:49:11 AM
I wish a knew.
Everyone seems to use the trident, gecko, or webkit engine now.
He who stumbles around in darkness with a stick is blind. But he who... sticks out in darkness... is... fluorescent! - Brother Silence
#3AcquirePosted 8/20/2013 12:18:19 PM
If firefox is too resource intensive for your rig, then it's not a very fast rig. Chrome is perfectly fine in terms of privacy, security, and performance.
And if you hear as the warm night falls. The silver sound from a time so strange. Sing to me, sing to me.
#4WyzeGyePosted 8/20/2013 12:33:16 PM
yeah, but how can you look down on people for using mainstream browsers if you're using a mainstream browser?
--- |