This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What video editing software should I get?

#1greenyoshi46Posted 8/30/2013 3:13:25 PM
Requierment is that it can save in .flv and put together clips from fraps and process at a high bitrate. I dont care if it saves in big file sizes. And I don't use alot of special editing features. It also needs to have a not so confusing UI like premiere pro.
---
(English is not my first language, Swedish is. So respect typos)
#2NicodimusPosted 8/30/2013 3:16:32 PM
For my purposes, Corel VideoStudio Pro X6 works well. Should be able to do what you asked.
---
My movie and gaming room: http://imgur.com/a/IjWr1
My pets: http://imgur.com/a/P9VGU
#3Gawl9427Posted 8/30/2013 3:36:44 PM
Nicodimus posted...
For my purposes, Corel VideoStudio Pro X6 works well. Should be able to do what you asked.


That's what I use and It's pretty good.
---
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3.7 GHz | 8GB DDR3 Kingston | 6950 2GB Unlocked | ASRock 970 Extreme4 | 750w PC Power & Cooling | Kuhler H20 620
Gamertag: Kether
#4iceachePosted 8/30/2013 3:55:32 PM
greenyoshi46 posted...
Requierment is that it can save in .flv .. It also needs to have a not so confusing UI like premiere pro.


What... and What???

Why **** flv and Premiere Pro is not confusing.
#5claytonbuckleyPosted 8/30/2013 6:04:16 PM
I use Sony Vegas and it meets all my requirements. Also i got it for free :)

99% of people i know hat edit game footage and stuff use Adobe Premiere.
---
http://steamcommunity.com/id/somonah/
#6greenyoshi46(Topic Creator)Posted 8/31/2013 2:33:44 AM
iceache posted...
greenyoshi46 posted...
Requierment is that it can save in .flv .. It also needs to have a not so confusing UI like premiere pro.


What... and What???

Why **** flv and Premiere Pro is not confusing.


.flv for my youtube videos and yes premiere pro is impossible for me to edit in. I used to use premiere express but now im looking for some newer software
---
(English is not my first language, Swedish is. So respect typos)
#7betatechPosted 8/31/2013 2:55:26 AM
Wouldn't mp4 be better for youtube?
---
Asus P8Z77-V Pro, Intel i7 3770K 3.5Ghz, 8GB RAM, Ati Radeon 5770 1GB, CM 690 II. Win7 x64.
#8LordSeiferPosted 8/31/2013 4:51:13 AM
youtube accepts a variety of formats
---
^ this
#9greenyoshi46(Topic Creator)Posted 8/31/2013 10:04:30 AM
betatech posted...
Wouldn't mp4 be better for youtube?


Well flv/f4v is more native to youtube. Mp4 would be better for html5 i guess
---
(English is not my first language, Swedish is. So respect typos)
#10betatechPosted 8/31/2013 3:28:16 PM
greenyoshi46 posted...
betatech posted...
Wouldn't mp4 be better for youtube?


Well flv/f4v is more native to youtube. Mp4 would be better for html5 i guess


I'm only thinking of quality since I presume youtube just takes the highest source and converts from there, when I've seen the formats youtube uses MP4 seems to be more common (e.g. 360/720/1080p).

I've never uploaded anything on to youtube so I'm merely guessing on my part.
---
Asus P8Z77-V Pro, Intel i7 3770K 3.5Ghz, 8GB RAM, Ati Radeon 5770 1GB, CM 690 II. Win7 x64.