This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Intel or AMD for gaming? Quad or 8 core?

#1GaMeFr33kPosted 10/2/2013 5:45:17 PM
I'm going to be building a PC from a website soon, (I've used ibuypower & ecollegepc in the past), and I'm wondering what to go with this time for CPU AMD or Intel? Which is better for gaming? Would a AMD 8 core 4.0ghz processor be overkill or needed for next gen gaming?

Any recommendations for good custom PC builders would be greatly appreciated as well, I just want a beast computer for gaming mostly. Thanks!
---
Level 36: Ancient of TrollFAQ's
#2Enigma149Posted 10/2/2013 5:48:37 PM(edited)
Intel, quad.

***EDIT***
Even though they have lower clock rates and fewer cores, they have much better performance than AMD. They cost a little bit more, too, but it's worth it.

***EDIT 2***
And don't even think about buying one of those 4.7 - 5 GHz CPUs from AMD - cheaper Intel parts will perform better in almost every task.
---
MOS 6510 @ 1.023 MHz // MOS VIC-II 6567 // 64 kB RAM // 20 kB ROM // 3ch MOS 6581 SID // 1541 FDD // Datasette
3DS: 4897-5935-1924; NN, Steam: CrimsonEnigma
#3Madmicky933Posted 10/2/2013 5:45:57 PM
Enigma149 posted...
Intel, quad.


This.
---
Karma... Is a powerful force..
#4cuteboi100Posted 10/2/2013 5:46:38 PM
fx-8350, octa-core.
---
Xbox Live GT:ScaryPillow , iHaruyuki TERA:
LoL : ScaryPillow Maplestory: MLGLordly 16x I/L Arch Mage
#5DV8ingSourcesPosted 10/2/2013 5:48:58 PM
Its not as cut and dry anymore. Games are more and more going to be capable of using more than 4 threads. AMD gets way too much hate on its cpu side and hyperthreading isn't as powerful as a full core.
TBH TC, I would currently recommend an i7 (4 core with hyperthreading) but, you wouldn't be doing yourself a disservice to get an AMD 8 core either.

Obviously, as usual with the tech sector, the longer you wait the better your options for a high end solution.
---
2500k @ 4.4 | P8Z68-V Pro | H80 | 8GB | 670 | 256 ssd | 6Tb hdd | Win 8 64bit | ax1200w | BD burner | cm690II
Steam: DV8ing1
#6GaMeFr33k(Topic Creator)Posted 10/2/2013 5:55:22 PM
I currently have a Intel i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz,

so if I bought an Intel Core i7-4770 Processor 3.5GHz, would I see a huge difference?

Also whats the diff between a "K" and a non K processor?
---
Level 36: Ancient of TrollFAQ's
#7BowsaaPosted 10/2/2013 5:59:43 PM
If you're running an i5-2500, even without overclocking you should be fine for a bit longer. There's no reason to upgrade now- wait another year or two until we see if games start using more cores, then you can get a clear-cut solution.
---
RENAMON!! *weeping* YOU HAVEN'T BENT ANYONE OVER THE SINK AND SHOVED A "CHECK THE STICKY* UP THEIR ASS IN MONTHS!! *curls into ball crying*- Cither3000
#8xxFierceFirexxPosted 10/2/2013 6:09:09 PM
GaMeFr33k posted...
I currently have a Intel i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz,

so if I bought an Intel Core i7-4770 Processor 3.5GHz, would I see a huge difference?

Also whats the diff between a "K" and a non K processor?


K means it's unlocked(Easier overclocking, I guess?)
#9DV8ingSourcesPosted 10/2/2013 6:11:24 PM
xxFierceFirexx posted...
K means it's unlocked(Easier overclocking, I guess?)


Only way to overclock the multiplier afaik and that is pretty much the only way to OC these days.
---
2500k @ 4.4 | P8Z68-V Pro | H80 | 8GB | 670 | 256 ssd | 6Tb hdd | Win 8 64bit | ax1200w | BD burner | cm690II
Steam: DV8ing1