This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Am I the only one annoyed with companies rebranding their model names?

#1KamenRiderBladePosted 10/8/2013 8:17:17 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_microprocessors

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_microprocessors

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units


AMD is doing that with their R9 280X, R7 270X, etc.

What was wrong with the old naming scheme?


Every company keeps rebranding and reworking their model names every few years, in reality, I find that unnecessary and confuses normal people.

Imagine what history would've been like if they had a consistent naming scheme for their product lines every year for every company.

Here's my idea for a consistent naming scheme for nvidia:
example: GeForce B90 (Letter = Generation; 9 = Performance Tier, 0 = Submodel)

There's enough letters for 26 generations, if you use lower case first, then uppercase, you can go 52 generations.

With the first digit, you would get the easy to understand indicator of Performance Tier like we currently have with the #80, #70, #60 series

And with the last digit, you can have unique variants within each tier if necessary.

I would've preferred this naming scheme over the numerous reworks over the years.

Any thoughts from the peanut gallery who has had to live through numerous product naming scheme reworks?
---
Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp 'Once Upon A Time in Mexico'
#2WyzeGyePosted 10/8/2013 8:19:54 PM
i think it's unnecessarily confusing yes.

but it also works to keep the peasants away.
---
http://i.imgur.com/2dhh8tn.gif | http://i.imgur.com/p5EXSiq.jpg
http://i.crackedcdn.com/phpimages/article/2/2/7/201227_v1.gif
#3Incendia_IntusPosted 10/8/2013 8:21:07 PM
I don't care I guess... I don't find it very hard to keep up.
---
GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 | i5-2500K @ 4.5GHz| Phantek PH-TC14PE| EVGA GTX 580 | G.SKILL Sniper 8GB | OCZ Vertex 2 40GB | WD Caviar Black 1TB | HAF 912 | HX750 750W
#4TimePharaohPosted 10/8/2013 8:22:46 PM
AMD=FINISHED
---
"HE are genius, firstly." - ASlaveObeys
http://i.imgur.com/SQAc17B.png
#5TheC0ndemnedOnePosted 10/8/2013 8:35:37 PM(edited)
To show revolution, not evolution (or both). To show that the old stuff is old.

Building upon the same thing gets boring eventually.

R_ 2__(X) is a silly naming scheme, though. It's more complicated and it's not as pleasing to the eye.
---
http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/55488_o.gif
http://www.d-e-f-i-n-i-t-e-l-y.com/
#6KaiRyusakiPosted 10/8/2013 8:26:25 PM
You want AMD Radeon HD 10950s?
#7OldSorrowPosted 10/8/2013 8:26:51 PM
I was going to get a Radeon HD over 9000 card but now it's not going to happen.
Thanks! AMD!
---
If you don't use Throwback Mode for a full week while logged in, you will lose access.
#8fataliPosted 10/8/2013 8:32:59 PM(edited)
I think they had a 9000 series like a decade ago, and then Nvidia had also a 9000 series like 5 years ago.

I believe that is why they didn't want to use it again.
---
Mystery is the source of all true science.
#9FlareZeroPosted 10/8/2013 8:34:59 PM
It doesn't really confuse me or anything so no.
---
You like it or you don't, but i hate people saying it's 'an acquired taste." That's just a cop out. - bookwormbabe29 on beer.
#10MasterDonGeroPosted 10/8/2013 8:38:15 PM
It's for marketing purposes, duh. If the name sounds better, then uninformed consumers will think it actually is better, and vice versa.

Also, it's not difficult for me to understand the names, because my IQ isn't lower than 50.
---
3570K (4.8 GHz) | Dual-X 7970 | ASRock Z77 OC Formula | Corsair Vengeance 2x 4 GB | WD Black 1 TB | Corsair TX750 | XSPC Raystorm 750 RS240 Kit | NZXT Phantom