This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

To all those wanting to play Crap of Duty: Ghosts and don't have 6GB RAM

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. To all those wanting to play Crap of Duty: Ghosts and don't have 6GB RAM

User Info: EGMRULZ

EGMRULZ
3 years ago#1
There is a RAM patch that you can apply that will "fool" the game into thinking your system has legit specs (6GB RAM). Just google if you need a link but if you guys get really desperate.

This is proof the game and Activision are full of crap. What a way to alienate all PC gamers out there who want to buy this game.

User Info: AlleRacing

AlleRacing
3 years ago#2
Between that, and the game itself being pretty poor (even reviewers are panning it, which I never expected to happen no matter how bad it was), just avoid it entirely.
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/8325/scrunchface2copyfx0.png
http://www.xboxlc.com/cards/default/alle5.jpg

User Info: EpicKingdom_

EpicKingdom_
3 years ago#3
And now we know the answer to "pfft wtf do you need 16GB of ram for?".
The PC gaming Master Race will never die out. We will continue to train, raise, and breed Master Race.
http://www.youtube.com/user/PCGamingMasterRace87/videos

User Info: Orestes417

Orestes417
3 years ago#4
Clearly to inflate stats for marketing purposes.
I am the mighty thesaurus! RAWR!

User Info: Lootman

Lootman
3 years ago#5
EpicKingdom_ posted...
And now we know the answer to "pfft wtf do you need 16GB of ram for?".


I don't think "I need 16GB of RAM to get a needed total of 6GB RAM" is a good reason...
\(._.)/ Kanakiri posted...
._.)/ I think you broke Lootman guys

User Info: NotQuiteAFreak

NotQuiteAFreak
3 years ago#6
AlleRacing posted...
Between that, and the game itself being pretty poor (even reviewers are panning it, which I never expected to happen no matter how bad it was), just avoid it entirely.


8/80's out of 10/100 is not "panning it".
Not changing sig till we get a sequel to Freedom Fighters.
Started 13/4/2010

User Info: Orestes417

Orestes417
3 years ago#7
Most of what I saw was more like 7's with a few lower. Polygon slammed them with a 6.5. For a series used to reviewers lining up to kiss their ass with 9s and 10s, yeah that's panning it. Hard.

EDIT: Just gonna leave this here. http://youtu.be/AAgc43e-zp4
I am the mighty thesaurus! RAWR!

User Info: AlleRacing

AlleRacing
3 years ago#8
NotQuiteAFreak posted...
AlleRacing posted...
Between that, and the game itself being pretty poor (even reviewers are panning it, which I never expected to happen no matter how bad it was), just avoid it entirely.


8/80's out of 10/100 is not "panning it".


Obviously I haven't seen every review, but I've seen quite a few 7s and lower popping up. With today's review rubric, that's pretty damn bad.
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/8325/scrunchface2copyfx0.png
http://www.xboxlc.com/cards/default/alle5.jpg

User Info: GalaxyNexus

GalaxyNexus
3 years ago#9
I wasted a good $60 on that game on Steam. I wish I could get my money back.

User Info: Hunter_mk

Hunter_mk
3 years ago#10
Orestes417 posted...
Most of what I saw was more like 7's with a few lower. Polygon slammed them with a 6.5. For a series used to reviewers lining up to kiss their ass with 9s and 10s, yeah that's panning it. Hard.

EDIT: Just gonna leave this here. http://youtu.be/AAgc43e-zp4

that was awful, even the menus lag, I can't believe they made the game worse than Blops2 (it was okay)
RIP Xbox One 2013-2013
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. To all those wanting to play Crap of Duty: Ghosts and don't have 6GB RAM

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived