This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What Field of View is objectively better between 90 and 120.

#1Linctagon7Posted 11/9/2013 11:02:03 PM
Preference out the window. Which is better and has the most optimal balance of peripheral vision and sight at range?
#2Kokuei05Posted 11/9/2013 11:02:28 PM
#3I aM tHe LeGeNdPosted 11/9/2013 11:05:06 PM
As long as its between 90 and 120 I am okay. I cant stand **** like 75.

Anyways Sometimes I choose 105
sometimes if the game allows a toggle for 90 (long range) and 105 (close combat).
AMD Phenom II X4 980@3.7ghz, 12GB RAM DDR3, 1TB HD, Geforce GTX 660 AMP!, 21.5", Win7
Intel Core i3 2350M@2.3ghz, 4GB RAM DDR3, 320GB HD, 15.6", Win7
#4Cool_Dude667Posted 11/9/2013 11:15:17 PM
Anything but 70
Not changing this sig until Christ returns -- Started 30 A.D
3770K @ 4.2Ghz | 16GB Corsair Vengeance | GTX 670 SLi
#5someguyshandPosted 11/9/2013 11:18:48 PM
It really depends on the aspect ratio of your monitor for optimal settings.
(Insert Name) killed Some Guy
#6daemon_danPosted 11/9/2013 11:23:01 PM
There is no "objectively better" when it comes to this. It's all subjective preference
"Frightened by your own smell. Bitterness will run you through."
~In Flames: Bullet Ride
#7Linctagon7(Topic Creator)Posted 11/9/2013 11:25:09 PM
From what I can tell 120 gives you massive peripheral vision which is always great and makes close-range a joy. But things at range will be much smaller and "fish-eyeing" is very apparent.

90 seems gives you decent peripheral vision and is a bit more suited to longer ranges. But in terms of awareness it can't touch 120.

It looks like 90 might be my baseline. I'm trying to establish a good FOV to use on all my shooters since I am new to PC. So any input is much appreciated.
#8xanthan1Posted 11/9/2013 11:43:16 PM
The one that somehow doesn't hinge on an opinion and is thus subjective. So neither.
#9Lord_CohlianiPosted 11/10/2013 12:02:04 AM
SteamID: Lord Cohliani
#10SpazH3dPosted 11/10/2013 1:10:41 AM
- My vision is augmented