This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

AMD v Intel/nVidia

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. AMD v Intel/nVidia
1 year ago#1
Ok I got an 8350 with a 7970 and was gonna build a new PC next year, I was thinking an Intel i5 4670k with a 780, was just wondering what performance increase I'd get? I was gonna stay AMD but they seem to be falling behind even further than before now and they've been doing some slinky stuff with their drivers like not signing them and installing some raptr thing without even asking or saying anything about it
---
PSN - ReapeR345 XBL - PrebuiltSafe23
FX 6100@3.3|6870|12GB|1TB|ATX Storm Enforcer
(edited 0 seconds ago)
1 year ago#2
That upgrade isn't remotely worth the cost.
---
Intel Core i7 3820 | EVGA X79 SLI K2 | MSI 7950 Twin Frozr III | Samsung / 840 120GB / 8GB RAM | 1TB WD Caviar Blue | Corsair / 550D / H70 | Silencer MKIII 600W
1 year ago#3
your sig says you're lying, TC
---
http://pcpartpicker.com/b/GCJ
http://youtu.be/AEKc-vNv_rU - updated 11/21/2013
1 year ago#4
Snuckie7 posted...
That upgrade isn't remotely worth the cost.


What performance increase would I get though? For an idea of what I'm getting I can play BF3 on medium at mostly 60fps but in more open maps it usually hovers around 50ish which is probably abit pathetic, and if it still isn't worth the cost what would be a good upgrade for next year?
---
PSN - ReapeR345 XBL - PrebuiltSafe23
FX 6100@3.3|6870|12GB|1TB|ATX Storm Enforcer
1 year ago#5
WyzeGye posted...
your sig says you're lying, TC


Snuckie7 posted...
That upgrade isn't remotely worth the cost.


They are both RIGHT!
---
FX8350 oc'ed 4.6ghz ASRock 990fx Extreme9 16 gigs ddr3 HIS 7870 :( antec 750W NZXT Phantom Full Tower http://imgur.com/DKxtZXP http://imgur.com/I9vdXTk
1 year ago#6
WyzeGye posted...
your sig says you're lying, TC


Havn't been on Gamefaqs for like a year I can't even remember how to edit it
---
PSN - ReapeR345 XBL - PrebuiltSafe23
FX 6100@3.3|6870|12GB|1TB|ATX Storm Enforcer
1 year ago#7
0ReapeR0 posted...
Snuckie7 posted...
That upgrade isn't remotely worth the cost.


What performance increase would I get though? For an idea of what I'm getting I can play BF3 on medium at mostly 60fps but in more open maps it usually hovers around 50ish which is probably abit pathetic, and if it still isn't worth the cost what would be a good upgrade for next year?


50 FPS on medium? That sounds awfully low for that setup. And off I go to Google...

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-7970-ghz-edition-review-benchmark,3232-8.html

According to this benchmark, a 7970 should average 80 FPS on Ultra High. Of course, the CPU influences your FPS, too, but your CPU is far from bad.
1 year ago#8
dekou posted...
0ReapeR0 posted...
Snuckie7 posted...
That upgrade isn't remotely worth the cost.


What performance increase would I get though? For an idea of what I'm getting I can play BF3 on medium at mostly 60fps but in more open maps it usually hovers around 50ish which is probably abit pathetic, and if it still isn't worth the cost what would be a good upgrade for next year?


50 FPS on medium? That sounds awfully low for that setup. And off I go to Google...

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-7970-ghz-edition-review-benchmark,3232-8.html

According to this benchmark, a 7970 should average 80 FPS on Ultra High. Of course, the CPU influences your FPS, too, but your CPU is far from bad.


That's singleplayer benchmarks I'm talking about online, single player I average about 70ish on ultra
---
PSN - ReapeR345 XBL - PrebuiltSafe23
FX 6100@3.3|6870|12GB|1TB|ATX Storm Enforcer
1 year ago#9
Why would you go from a 6300 to a 8350?
Depending on the game, it could be anywhere from a 70% to a -30% difference.
---
Even people have toenails. Of course PCs have toenails. -claytonbuckley
1 year ago#10
DarkZV2Beta posted...
Why would you go from a 6300 to a 8350?
Depending on the game, it could be anywhere from a 70% to a -30% difference.


I went from a 6100, bulldozer to a piledriver

And last time I came here people were always talking crap about AMD saying the whole FX line is disgustingly weak compared to the i5, now there's apparently no difference
---
FX 8350@4.0|7970|12GB|1TB|M5A11x|CX750M|ATX Storm Enforcer
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. AMD v Intel/nVidia

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived