This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

affordable 4k is coming

#21Snuckie7Posted 12/3/2013 7:20:43 PM
PraetorXyn posted...
I_Am_On_Fire posted...
xcmon3yx2 posted...
behind the 780ti the titan is the fastest single card.
I don't know where you are getting at


It's Snuckie, so he probably wants you to run XFX R9 290's overclocked to 290X in Crossfire.

Yeah because it's indisputably the fastest graphics card setup you can buy for $800.

inb4temps=heat
inb4referencecoolerfriesothercomponents
---
Intel Core i7 3820 | EVGA X79 SLI K2 | MSI 7950 Twin Frozr III | Samsung / 840 120GB / 8GB RAM | 1TB WD Caviar Blue | Corsair / 550D / H70 | Silencer MKIII 600W
#22Combo MasterPosted 12/3/2013 8:20:50 PM(edited)
Is it confirmed that the 28 inch ultra hd monitor is going to be 60hz? It doesn't make sense to me why the 24 inch would be $1400 and the 32 inch would be $3500 if the 28 inch is going to be under $1000 unless it really isn't 4k. I assume the 28 inch would have to be 30hz than and the other 2 are 60hz?? If not the pricing makes no sense.

From what I am reading on another forum the 28 inch $1000 monitor does appear to be 60hz!!! It just uses 8 bit color and the others use 10.I don't know the difference between them but that is pretty exciting to have a 60hz 4k monitor be $1000.

Another reason not to care at all about consoles...Besides the exclusive games of course so I guess I still will always... pffft
---
Combo Master
#23Combo MasterPosted 12/3/2013 8:20:08 PM
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
#24TheC0ndemnedOnePosted 12/3/2013 8:34:03 PM
Not a bad price for a high-end Dell monitor. I'd like to see what ASUS brings to the table. They have the best affordable monitors.
---
http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/55488_o.gif
http://www.d-e-f-i-n-i-t-e-l-y.com/
#25AcquirePosted 12/3/2013 8:41:27 PM
Combo Master posted...
Is it confirmed that the 28 inch ultra hd monitor is going to be 60hz? It doesn't make sense to me why the 24 inch would be $1400 and the 32 inch would be $3500 if the 28 inch is going to be under $1000 unless it really isn't 4k. I assume the 28 inch would have to be 30hz than and the other 2 are 60hz?? If not the pricing makes no sense.

From what I am reading on another forum the 28 inch $1000 monitor does appear to be 60hz!!! It just uses 8 bit color and the others use 10.I don't know the difference between them but that is pretty exciting to have a 60hz 4k monitor be $1000.

Another reason not to care at all about consoles...Besides the exclusive games of course so I guess I still will always... pffft


10 bit color monitors are meant for professional use. It's useless for gaming and consumer applications. The application has to support 10 bit color mode and you need a workstation video card for those applications anyway.

This is awesome if they bring out this monitor for that cheap. It would be even better if it had g sync support.
---
And if you hear as the warm night falls. The silver sound from a time so strange. Sing to me, sing to me.
#26_GRIM_FANDANGO_Posted 12/3/2013 10:14:36 PM
KabtheMentat posted...
4k gaming isn't going to be mainstream for a long awhile. Get over it.


And even if the monitors become affordable, the hardware that enable you to run games at higher settings on those monitors is not.
---
I5 3570 | GTX 760 | FILCO Majestouch 2 tenkeyless | Zowie FK | Asus Xonar DGX | Kingston 120 GB SSD | Sennheiser HD 518 | Samsung S24A350H
#27DarkZV2BetaPosted 12/3/2013 10:46:04 PM
_GRIM_FANDANGO_ posted...
KabtheMentat posted...
4k gaming isn't going to be mainstream for a long awhile. Get over it.


And even if the monitors become affordable, the hardware that enable you to run games at higher settings on those monitors is not.


It's not a requirement to run games at maximum settings and 60fps all the time, and midrange hardware can handle 4k in a lot of software. It's no an ideal setup, but it's viable, and hardware is only getting better with time.
---
god invented extension cords. -elchris79
#28fuzzymanPosted 12/4/2013 1:07:10 AM(edited)
24" 4k is pointless for gaming (besides editing)

31.5" is bueno, 50" is better
---
http://i.imgur.com/hOjV6w3.jpg
#29SlaynPosted 12/4/2013 1:15:45 AM
DarkZV2Beta posted...
_GRIM_FANDANGO_ posted...
KabtheMentat posted...
4k gaming isn't going to be mainstream for a long awhile. Get over it.


And even if the monitors become affordable, the hardware that enable you to run games at higher settings on those monitors is not.


It's not a requirement to run games at maximum settings and 60fps all the time, and midrange hardware can handle 4k in a lot of software. It's no an ideal setup, but it's viable, and hardware is only getting better with time.


I'd rather run games at 1440 120hz than 4k 30hz.
---
ZOMG Pokeyman craze! FC: 2036-7659-0505
#30SenkoyPosted 12/4/2013 1:39:34 AM
I'll wait for OLED 4k 120hz TVs become affordable. I don't care how long I have to wait, but that's what I want.
---
My fight stick: http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/2687/sdc10110k.jpg
My team combos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdoD7BvGUOE