This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

so grand theft auto 5 is not coming to pc?

#41arleasPosted 12/27/2013 2:14:33 PM
From: steveboblarry | #037
MANGOURISH I SUMMON THEE!!!!!!!


That would be the only way this topic could sink any lower.

From: fire2box | #040
I can see them doing a good port since GTA V is using Max Payne 3's engine IIRC.


Well that's cool... as long as it's moddable it doesn't really matter. Someone will come along and fix the game.
---
http://raptr.com/badge/arleas/uc.png
http://www.speedtest.net/result/2868545294.png
#42JKatarnPosted 12/27/2013 2:54:35 PM
wentzelot posted...
supersekh posted...
wentzelot posted...
Majoras_pants posted...
It is, eventually.


source pls


Source that its not?


do you know how burden of proof works when making a claim/statement?


This is GameFAQs where many don't seem to have a grasp of elementary school level grammar, so I'm going to say no.
---
Asus P8Z68-V LE | Core i7 2600K | 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 | Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 Windforce OC
PS3 | PS2 | PSP| Wii | 3DS | DS | X-Box 360 | X-Box | NES
#43calcyclePosted 12/27/2013 3:09:12 PM
Would it have been better if he said this?

Majoras_pants posted...
It probably will, eventually. Based on past evidence all GTA games come out on consoles first and PC later.


I don't know why everyone is getting worked up about this
---
Do not add to the Chocolate of Coach, or worship false Bills for this will imprison thou within the Blood Harvest finale for all eternity
Steam: Albatrossing
#44harcoreblazerPosted 12/27/2013 3:11:07 PM
wentzelot posted...
Majoras_pants posted...
It is, eventually.


source pls


http://source.valvesoftware.com/
---
PSN/Steam = retrohunter95.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS4HQWWuqP8&feature=youtu.be
#45clowningPosted 12/27/2013 3:20:45 PM
cuteboi100 posted...
clowning posted...


The purpose of a claim or argument is to convince someone of something. Without evidence to support said claim, people will not be convinced. So while no one knows whether or not you have a gold medal, you will have failed to convince anyone of your claim's veracity. Thus, the burden of proof falls on the claimant, always.


If you do not accept the gold medal example as proof that it is wrong to assume something then you are too far gone in your dogmatism.


This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

To be unconvinced that someone's claim is true, simply on the basis of said claim, is not the definition of assumption. It is the definition of skepticism.

Not only do you not know what an "assumption" is, you also have no idea what "dogmatism" means, either.
---
It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. ...one begins to twist facts to suit theories.... Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
#46SpazH3dPosted 12/27/2013 4:56:53 PM
It is definitely not not not NOT coming to PC.

In 2013.

Source: Tinkerbell told me.
---
- My vision is augmented
#47cuteboi100Posted 12/27/2013 5:51:34 PM(edited)
clowning posted...


To be unconvinced that someone's claim is true, simply on the basis of said claim, is not the definition of assumption. It is the definition of skepticism.



Being unconvinced that something is true is not the same as saying something is untrue. It is what was said and is a great example of an assumption. Maybe you should learn to read posts before you respond.
---
Attack Jet - Division 1 (World) | Fighter Jet - Division 1 (World)
Fighter Jet - Division 1 (Toronto), Rank #6
#48_GRIM_FANDANGO_Posted 12/27/2013 6:23:33 PM
Probably, eventually.

I just played it on console though.
---
I5 3570 | GTX 760 | FILCO Majestouch 2 tenkeyless | Zowie FK | Asus Xonar DGX | Kingston 120 GB SSD | Sennheiser HD 518 | Samsung S24A350H