This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Isn't Google Fiber redundant?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Isn't Google Fiber redundant?
2 years ago#1
Sure for those with 10-25 Mbit/s download it's a godsend. But wouldn't I be right in saying that no server will let you download (Or has the capability) at a speed of 1 Gbit/s. Why not just settle with an ISP that provides 150 Mbit/s?

Also privacy is another thing I would be concerned with when using Google Fiber

Am I missing something here, or is it just that the physical service of American ISPs are just inferior?
2 years ago#2
While the rest of actual infrastructure might not be reaching up to actual gigabit capabilities, Google Fiber provides that possible competition that would stop the rest of the ISPs from sandbagging their inferior service.
---
"TSA lady opened my bag and asked me about my Magic: The Gathering booster packs.
I explained that they're not weapons since I have no land." -Day[9]
2 years ago#3
Ah, that's a good point. But I doubt it will change anytime soon as it's only available in three cities. I doubt other ISPs will bend their back just for those three specific cities. And by the looks of it, their locations don't seem to be expanding fast.
2 years ago#4
The city i'm moving to is likely to be the first Canadian city to get it, so I'm happy about that.

http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1720932,00.html
---
http://i.imgur.com/e4IiIHn.png
2 years ago#5
well most people do not have access to 100mbit internet service either.

and if no one can stream to you at 1000, then it doesnt really cost them anything to give you a thousand, so, why not, its better marketing, do you want 150 or do you want 1000

1000 is harder to compete with
---
^ this
2 years ago#6
Something has to lead the way.
---
Deth Pen
http://i.imgur.com/eMXgU.gif
2 years ago#7
It's not more about the point of "Why not? 1000 > 100" from Google's point of view it's more a question of why people are drooling over it from the consumer's point of view.

And yes that's also true about 100 not being so easily available, but I would wager it's significantly more available than Google's. Another great thing about it is that it is incredibly cheap, I pay 60 for 15 down with a 300GB cap..

I'm just saying, if you already have a decent speed (>100) why upgrade? That is, if it's more expensive.
2 years ago#8
Saga3 posted...
. Another great thing about it is that it is incredibly cheap,

---
^ this
2 years ago#9
LordSeifer posted...
well most people do not have access to 100mbit internet service either.

and if no one can stream to you at 1000, then it doesnt really cost them anything to give you a thousand, so, why not, its better marketing, do you want 150 or do you want 1000

1000 is harder to compete with


Pretty much this. It's not the first time Google has done something like this, Gmail anyone?
---
Ooo eee, oo ah ah, ting tang, walla walla bing bang.
2 years ago#10
Well yes, I guess the price does pretty much decimate any argument against its redundancy since I assume it's around $50 for 25 down.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Isn't Google Fiber redundant?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived