Titanfall is source engine and the game does not look like it will be more graphically intensive than BF4 for example, so I doubt that would be a problem.
I have no idea about the requirements of TW3, but I think it is safe to assume that at the very least you will be able to run it. --- I5 3570 | GTX 760 | FILCO Majestouch 2 tenkeyless | Deathadder 3.5G full gloss | Asus Xonar DGX | Kingston 120 GB SSD | Sennheiser HD 518 | Samsung S24A350H
If CDprojekt RED actually made the witcher 3 so it couldn't run on something like a 760 then they might aswell not bother with a pc version at all. They would be severely limiting thier potential customers. Remember all the screenshots will be max settings. You won't get max settings but it will run no problem and still look beautiful whatever.
Titanfall is a source engine game. Show me a single source engine game so far the 760 can't max at 120fps!
Titanfall is on the Source engine, a toaster can max that out nowadays. --- http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/daylecman Phenom II X6 1075T @ 3.5GHz - 4GB DDR3 - 120GB SSD - GTX 460 1GB - Blackwidow Ultimate
titanfall for sure because lets face it, the game may be from the old IW team that made the last good CoD game, but it was still probably made with consoles in mind and is just going to be a port anyway. no way to know about TW3 yet
They may be responsible for the best CoD game, but they were also responsible for the worst. And seeing as how that was the last game they made, it might be better to take them off that pedestal you're putting them on until the game actually comes out?
MW2 is regarded as the most fun in the series to a lot of players. it was a time when they weren't afraid to take risks and try to create something extremly unique unlike the cut and paste crap now. Me and a group of friends clocked over 35 days of playtime in that game and it never got old. Speak for yourself. --- PC: http://i.imgur.com/9Ho6VA1.jpg