This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

does crysis 3 suck?

#21Grey_Asakura(Topic Creator)Posted 4/27/2014 12:37:29 PM
playign thru crysis 2 atm and its pretty damn boring
whats a good fps/rpg ish that will last a while and not borderlands/antyhing from bethesda?
#22TropicMoon10Posted 4/27/2014 1:03:07 PM
Grey_Asakura posted...
playign thru crysis 2 atm and its pretty damn boring
whats a good fps/rpg ish that will last a while and not borderlands/antyhing from bethesda?

Shadow Warrior
#23SnadadosPosted 4/27/2014 1:34:48 PM
Bmvc1 posted...
All Crysis games suck. They look good doing it, though.

Have you accepted Raspberyl as your loli and savior?
#24BilliePilgrimPosted 4/27/2014 1:52:25 PM
People jump too quickly to call a game bad. The crysis games are solid shooters. They don't really do anything new or exciting, but they don't do anything terrible either. If you were just bored by it and think that's enough to say a game sucks, well you've lived a charmed life up to this point.
i5 2500k @ 4.4| Corsair H60 | EVGA GTX 670 | MSI P67A-GD55 | 8GB DDR3 1600 | Fractal Design Define XL | 750W PSU
#25_Marka_Ragnos_Posted 4/27/2014 2:22:33 PM
Crysis 1 was fantastic. The graphics were unmatched (And still are to some extent) and the levels felt huge. There was something about running through the jungle with helicopters shooting you and trees falling all around you. Or seeing a group of enemies on a rope bridge and shooting down the ropes that kept the bridge up. The physics were a joy to use.

Crysis 2 sucked

Crysis 3 is a bit more like Crysis 1 but still doesn't have that same feeling of awesomeness. The graphics are incredible and the levels feel a hell of a lot larger than 2's, but doesn't capture what made 1 awesome.
i5 4670k| 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3| EVGA GTX 780|Alienware m17x|iPad Air
#26LaManoNeraIIPosted 4/27/2014 2:52:44 PM
Crisis 1 is great. Very faithful spiritual sequel to Far Cry. Warhead is even better.

2 and 3 were trying to be more "modern". Don't care for either one
R.I.P LaManoNera
#27dementedlullabyPosted 4/27/2014 3:17:00 PM
EpicKingdom_ posted...
I really enjoyed the original Crysis, but 2 & 3 have always been there as a graphical showcase for me... seriously, I only boot them up for benchmarks.

Two only looks good with Maldo HD and Blackfire 2.0 imo. Otherwise it's not that great looking.

Crysis 3 is sweet looking imo. I'd like to try Realism mod.
The Imperial Truth is a Lie
#28DarkZV2BetaPosted 4/27/2014 3:22:13 PM
Crysis 3 is kind of buggy, and lacks polish, and on top of that, it likes to throw long empty segments of nothing at the player to make the areas seem bigger than they are, but it fails to really be open ended, and mostly just feels like a prettied up rehash of 2 with longer walks.

I didn't even manage to complete it, and I had no trouble beating two a couple times.
god invented extension cords. -elchris79
Starcraft 2 has no depth or challenge -GoreGross
#29torres007Posted 4/27/2014 3:49:38 PM
I feel like they all have solid mechanics, but Crytek doesn't know how to put together a good campaign.
From: OffTopicster | Posted: 8/27/2005 5:32:40 PM
Torres man get a sig.
#30DiviDudePosted 4/27/2014 3:55:54 PM
I thought they were all pretty forgettable. I liked 2 best because stealth was most viable in that compared to the other two, but even so, meh all around.