This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Will Battlefield: Hardline and RainbowSix: Siege finally kill CS?

#41NemerlightPosted 6/15/2014 3:39:03 AM
Hardline should have been a DLC and not full game.
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare is the best PC game of 2012.
#42Orestes417Posted 6/15/2014 3:51:33 AM(edited)
Yeah.... That's one of the more persistent idiocies being spouted lately. Usually by those who either haven't actually played the game or are completely oblivious to differences. I expect the same morons would say 2142 and Vietnam should've been DLC too. The jury is out on the quality of the product but if you think what's there begins to fit with BF4... Christ you make the CoD comparison Nimrods look like ivy leaguers.
Some roads you shouldn't go down because maps used to say there'd be dragons there. Now they don't, but that don't mean the dragons aren't there.
#43TropicMoon10Posted 6/15/2014 4:30:18 AM
Nemerlight posted...
Hardline should have been a DLC and not full game.

Not even.

Having played the beta, it feels more like a fanmade mod.
#44MELENTIAPosted 6/15/2014 5:26:53 AM
Hardlines pretty bad, played about an hour and I'm done. Siege however looks really good, far better then that crappy BF. Can't say for sure until it's out. CS has been dead for a while for me though.
#45LazyyAmericanPosted 6/15/2014 5:55:41 PM
All a bunch of michael bay inspired nonsense....check out ground branch if you'd prefer less dramatic explosions, cussing, and rap music.
Quite the coexist in a world that ostracizes you into obscurity
#46biohazard1775Posted 6/15/2014 7:36:43 PM
Hardline looks pretty bad.

Siege doesn't look like it'll go back to the tactical combat of 3 so I'm not interested.
Iron Within, Iron Without