This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

30fps is superior to 60fps

  • Topic Archived

You have been randomly selected to participate in the Beta Test of our new message list page. We've rolled out this test in order to get additional feedback and error reports from a wider subset of users. We'll only display this notice once, but permanent links to disable the Beta, provide feedback, and get more information will be located at the bottom of each message list.

To disable this test for now, click here. For more information, please read our announcement about this redesign.

  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. 30fps is superior to 60fps
10 months ago#1
Facts on why 30fps is better.

-Cinematic experience
-60 FPS looks fake
-60 FPS only benefits Fighting/Racing/Online FPS games
-60 FPS makes games look worse visually
-30 FPS makes makes games look graphically better
-I can't see the difference at all
-Back in my day people didn't care about graphics
-60 FPS doesn't matter because gameplay matters more
10 months ago#2
Go away
---
PC Gaming - The Only Way
i5 3570K / ASRock Z77 Extreme 4 / Patriot Viper 8GB /Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 3GB/ Corsair TX650
10 months ago#3
Well, if 60 fps looks fake, then I guess reality is even faker.
---
Words That Kill
GT: Risev / PSN: RiseQ8
#4
(message deleted)
10 months ago#5
wildog2006 posted...
This topic is now about how many hamsters would need to be stacked on top of each other in order to reach the moon.

I think it would be about 12. Yes, 12 should be plenty to reach the moon.


12x10^15 is my guess.
---
---
Meh...
10 months ago#6
Derp topic, but:

-I can't see the difference at all

Nullifies all other opinions listed.
---
PC: http://i.imgur.com/zgyKBAY.jpg
10 months ago#7
HighOnPhazon posted...
Go away

---
Not changing this sig until Christ returns -- Started 30 A.D
3770K @ 4.2Ghz | 16GB Corsair Vengeance | GTX 670 SLi
10 months ago#8
wildog2006 posted...
This topic is now about how many hamsters would need to be stacked on top of each other in order to reach the moon.

I think it would be about 12. Yes, 12 should be plenty to reach the moon.


If I didn't suck at maths, I'd be doing some serious calculations right now

But I failed maths, so I won't bother.
---
"I'm amazed TC is still posting. It's not your everyday run of the mill stupidity. This is advanced stupidity." -nickizgr8
10 months ago#9
Nex-Gen63759 posted...
Facts on why 30fps is better.

-Cinematic experience
-60 FPS looks fake
-60 FPS only benefits Fighting/Racing/Online FPS games
-60 FPS makes games look worse visually
-30 FPS makes makes games look graphically better
-I can't see the difference at all
-Back in my day people didn't care about graphics
-60 FPS doesn't matter because gameplay matters more


No friend, I think you are mistaken. This isn't a console board.
---
If you believe in Marona as your Loli and Savior and you're not ashamed, put this in your signature. :3
http://i.imgur.com/GV8UFZR.png
10 months ago#10
Many consoles ran Games at 60FPS.
NES
SNES
Genesis
PS1
PS2
many others...

Topic is a horrible troll attempt
---
We're Americans! We don't quit just because we're wrong.
We just keep doing the wrong thing until it turns out right.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. 30fps is superior to 60fps

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

Message List Beta Test is now on. To disable the Beta, just click here, or you can read more about it, report an error, or provide general feedback.
  • Topic Archived